I suppose we should just let the welfare ranchers take all that land and say **** everyone else.
If they receive subsidies then they indeed are 'welfare ranchers' and that should not be happening, the same way alternate energy manufacturers [solyndra] shouldn't be receiving subsidies, but operate on their on two feet.
However if you're saying 'welfare ranchers' for the simple reason that they're using public land...then I disagree with your premise.
Comment