Who will be THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A? Obama or Romney?

[arraamis]

Are people still peddling this lie?

http://factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-...cer-overreach/

I'll call and raise ...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...s-outsourcing/

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...na-global-tech

[Jim Jeffries]

I'll call and raise ...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...s-outsourcing/

I'm guessing you didn't read this one.

The one caveat is there is a gray area of direct accountability, because no one has reported that he was personally involved in managing those firms.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...na-global-tech

Mother Jones? Really? What's next? An Alex Jones video?

[MetalVomit]

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb...type=1&theater

[MetalVomit]

lol, politifact

[MetalVomit]

a Republican President gets calls for impeachment over this. "What did he know, when did he know it, why didn't he do anything", etc.

http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affa...s?set_fb_var=1

[MetalVomit]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=nlvqqNG4hr8

[arraamis]

I'm guessing you didn't read this one.

The one caveat is there is a gray area of direct accountability, because no one has reported that he was personally involved in managing those firms.
?

Yes, I DID read it and it reveals why the issue is important -- Romney is claiming he wasn't actively running the company while the outsourcing ventures prospered. His tax-returns will show he was not only still on the board, but also, still making decisions. This is why he will not release those Tax-Returns, because it is incriminating evidence that he lied.

[MetalVomit]

again, a Republican would be impeached for this Fast and Furious deal.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...and-furious-w/

[Jim Jeffries]

Yes, I DID read it and it reveals why the issue is important -- Romney is claiming he wasn't actively running the company while the outsourcing ventures prospered. His tax-returns will show he was not only still on the board, but also, still making decisions. This is why he will not release those Tax-Returns, because it is incriminating evidence that he lied.

So you continue to perpetuate a lie without a single shred of evidence?

again, a Republican would be impeached for this Fast and Furious deal.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...and-furious-w/

It was certainly odd for Obama to exert Executive Privilege over something he supposedly had nothing to do with.

Have you seen this yet?

[arraamis]

So you continue to perpetuate a lie without a single shred of evidence?

You're correct, until Romney releases all his returns, there is no evidence the above comments are true. Its easy to call something a lie, when the documentation proving the contrary, remains hidden from public scrutiny. If I, like Romney, held incriminating evidence in the form of past tax-returns, I wouldn't release them either.