'misinformation'

[Prince Madison]

who gets to decide what can be said and what cant? whats right and whats wrong?

[Kris Silver]

Very surprising that you have no idea how to assess, grasp, categorise sources, recognise respected sources, experts, reputable outlets, Vs those not so.

A real surprise, and that man down agrees.

The two forum gullible ones chewing up any conspiracies, alt news and propaganda, like M&M's.

[Prince Madison]

Very surprising that you have no idea how to assess, grasp, categorise sources, recognise respected sources, experts, reputable outlets, Vs those not so.

A real surprise, and that man down agrees.

The two forum gullible ones chewing up any conspiracies, alt news and propaganda, like M&M's.

what have i done wrong now?

[Rockin']

Very surprising that you have no idea how to assess, grasp, categorise sources, recognise respected sources, experts, reputable outlets, Vs those not so.

A real surprise, and that man down agrees.

The two forum gullible ones chewing up any conspiracies, alt news and propaganda, like M&M's.

So what do you do when your 'respectable sources' suddenly turn to sheet and start promoting propaganda?

You find new resources.

Also, you haven't noticed any of these conspiracy theories coming true?

Your MSM will never tell you about those.

BAAAA, BAAAAAaaaaa................Rockin'

[1bad65]

who gets to decide what can be said and what cant? whats right and whats wrong?

They used to have a policy here that any claims made must be proved if asked, and failure to do so brought a ban.

After they got rid of that policy, the base trolling here skyrocketed.

[GhostofDempsey]

They used to have a policy here that any claims made must be proved if asked, and failure to do so brought a ban.

After they got rid of that policy, the base trolling here skyrocketed.

The trolls who demand links and sources either never provide them or when they do it’s a disreputable network that has been forced to retract multiple stories for outright lying. Now they are angry at Twitter because it allows both sides to speak freely.

[billeau2]

Very surprising that you have no idea how to assess, grasp, categorise sources, recognise respected sources, experts, reputable outlets, Vs those not so.

A real surprise, and that man down agrees.

The two forum gullible ones chewing up any conspiracies, alt news and propaganda, like M&M's.

[billeau2]

what have i done wrong now?

Nothing... no irony here... brawhaha!!

[billeau2]

They used to have a policy here that any claims made must be proved if asked, and failure to do so brought a ban.

After they got rid of that policy, the base trolling here skyrocketed.

Must be all those strawmen...

[billeau2]

The trolls who demand links and sources either never provide them or when they do it’s a disreputable network that has been forced to retract multiple stories for outright lying. Now they are angry at Twitter because it allows both sides to speak freely.

That's true at times, but perhaps the real distinction is not in what information is used, rather how information is used. If you look carefully in the internet age information is often weaponized. It can be used to distort, provoke unnecessarily, or even take something that is true at least fundamentally, and take it out of context making it a falsehood