Originally posted by TheNegation
View Post
You can cite bunches of examples for the Pats playing badly. Losing to Cardinals. Giving up 26 points to the Jets who don't even know what the end zone looks like. 31 to the Bills. 31 to the Ravens. 41 to San Francisco. Trying to lose to Jacksonville everyway possible last week.
At *this point* in the season arguing the Patriots defense is anywhere near as good as Broncos is pretty out there. Broncos clearly have the better defense.
Brady can't win another Superbowl, he's incapable of doing it. Ever since 2005 he has chocked in the playoffs, either early or later.
I mean come on it wasn't a mystery you were going to make the playoffs either, not because of Manning but because of the AFC west. Denver winning the west is like Usain Bolt beating Stephen Hawkins in a footrace. Although I will admit that the AFC East isn't exactly competitive this year either.
But I think we've played and beaten better teams including Houston and Denver, if it weren't for ******ed Zebra's we'd have beaten the Ravens and Stevan Ridley wasn't such a phaggot fumbler we probably would have beaten the Niners too.
Are you serious on the schedules? Broncos have a better strength of schedule.
http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/po...th-of-schedule
New England has the worst opposing record win % schedule, Broncos have the 2nd highest. Broncos only 3 losses were to Atlanta 13-3, Texans 12-4, New England 12-4 and all the games were close and all losses early on. Before the Offense and Defense really got on a roll and Peyton Manning got back into routine.
We have a balanced offense for the first time since Corey Dillion and it's ranked #1. I'm not sure how being the #1 ranked offense doesn't scare anyone.
It's a bit much to say "It's Fact" when New England lost (and could have lost even a few more games) games to teams they should have beat. Everyone gives them respect, nobody gives the forgone conclusion.
They were 18-0. Remember that forgone conclusion?
Comment