Originally posted by HedonisticFrog
View Post
1/ never claimed weight lifting would reduce range of motion. Heavy weightlifting definitely does produce stiffness, that is proven.
2/ I wasn't talking about cardio, I was referring to muscular endurance. During boxing, the white fibre muscles exhaust quickly and build up acid, the redder ones are much better at getting rid of it.
3/ Pure lifters might not get injured much as they only lift. Sports athletes who use lifting might definitely get injured more and obviously do (check out all the injured boxers today, they always cite weight training.)
Again, the power generation and delivery of a punch comes from the ground, gravity and body weight. The only time the muscles forcefully contract is the moment of impact.
The strength part of it is concerned with stopping your body on a time and transferring the power. It does not make you faster.
In fact, I can actually show what I am talking about with some stats.
Take any highly weight trained boxer like Holyfield for example who has moved up in weight (it works with all of them as it's a universal principle). As he gained muscle mass through heavy lifting and steroids, his strength grew but his power did not grow proportially. As a result of the increased weight he gained crude power but his punching power as a HW was quite weak as evidenced by his KO ratio. Keep in mind, being naturally smaller and faster and having a well rounded game from CW should have given him an advantage in delivery, but he still could not produce single shot KO power. You will find when you analyse all such "muscled up" boxers that they do not carry their power with them.
Another thing to consider is to look at all the fastest boxers at HW where different shapes of boxers are together.
Most of the weightlifting types are slowest.
Most of the non-weightlifting types are fastest.
Comment