I've been ******* up my gUNZ an mi BICEpts, BRAH!!!

[T.Horton]

LOLOL, pepporoni nipple of peace

No chest of peace

Don't even lift of peace

dude, you just got owned. no joke.

[Layzie Kidd]

LOLOL, pepporoni nipple of peace

No chest of peace

No arms of peace

Don't even lift of peace

Right, I'm sure its so terrible, coming from a un-proportionate mutant who doesnt know how to fight.

Also lol @ Everything you edited in there. Someones mad.

[T.Horton]

How so? His physique is nothing special and I can tell he doesn't lift and is weak.

He has abs...that's it. So? I have abs. It's not that impressive. It's called being 130 pounds soaking wet (him, not me).

he's a fighter and he's clearly fit as hell, i think we all know that he doesn't lift since that's been his contention since the beginning. You asked for his physique and then laughed when he posted it, simply to save face.

Not cool.

[Layzie Kidd]

he's a fighter and he's clearly fit as hell, i think we all know that he doesn't lift since that's been his contention since the beginning. You asked for his physique and then laughed when he posted it, simply to save face.

Not cool.

Whats funny is that he doesnt get that the point is I dont lift. And that I'm also not one bit wet in that picture, my towl isnt even wet.

We should probably ignore him now since he just being desperate and the point was proven.

[sammiza567]

having more experience in the sport than most people on this site, weights can make a big difference. i dont like the physique argument because, and especially for a fighter, its not important. what is important is maintaining your weight while adding strength and power. not training for hypertrophy or mass. two completely different things. skills pay the bills and is what matters. but to just neglect weights s/c altogether is just plain dumb. the athletes now are ten times what they were 50 years ago.

[sammiza567]

and force equals mass times acceleration. this means if you can peak or significantly improve the mass component of the equation(not gaining weight just strength) while keeping the acceleration the same( in my experience weights will improve this aspect also) you will gain power that directly translates into most sports. take a golfer who does x amount of hours practicing his skill set. that guy can squat 100 lbs, deadlifts 100 lbs, and bench 100 lbs. now take same guy, without significantly reducing the skills training, and now say he can squat 400 lbs, deadlift 500 lbs, and bench 300, he will hit the ball further. once you hit certain numbers in your lifts, the cost/benefit ratio wont be good enough to keep lifting more than 2 days a week, if your a serious fighter. what that means is you wont get strong as quickly after 2 years of training as you did in the first 2 years, and the cost of taxing your body with weight sessions wont give you enough gains while taking away from your skill training. bottom line, lift weights, but not a priority if your boxing. 2-3 days a week right around 1 hour per weight session.

[Redd Foxx]

and force equals mass times acceleration. this means if you can peak or significantly improve the mass component of the equation(not gaining weight just strength) while keeping the acceleration the same( in my experience weights will improve this aspect also) you will gain power that directly translates into most sports. take a golfer who does x amount of hours practicing his skill set. that guy can squat 100 lbs, deadlifts 100 lbs, and bench 100 lbs. now take same guy, without significantly reducing the skills training, and now say he can squat 400 lbs, deadlift 500 lbs, and bench 300, he will hit the ball further. once you hit certain numbers in your lifts, the cost/benefit ratio wont be good enough to keep lifting more than 2 days a week, if your a serious fighter. what that means is you wont get strong as quickly after 2 years of training as you did in the first 2 years, and the cost of taxing your body with weight sessions wont give you enough gains while taking away from your skill training. bottom line, lift weights, but not a priority if your boxing. 2-3 days a week right around 1 hour per weight session.

Sounds good on paper, but it doesn't always work out that way in application. I, as an adult, have had a nearly 100lb spread in weight, never with any excess fat. Being larger from weight training hindered my flexibility and consequently speed. I can hit much harder at 175 than I can at 230 because I can move better, not to mention having the ability to go five times longer. Grappling is a different story. I do light weight lifting as a boxer, mostly for cosmetic reasons, but as someone who has been on both sides, weight training does nothing for my boxing that conventional boxing training can't do.

[-Jay-]

How am I desperate and what point was proven? All that you've proven is that you're small and scrawny.

This is a boxing forum, not a bodybuilding forum. No one cares how big you are.

Its great that you've got out there and met some personal goals and are proud of your achievements but your constant arguing in this section isn't making you look good.

[Left2theliver]

I think some folks are taking the OP's post a liiiiittle too serious.

[BennyST]

having more experience in the sport than most people on this site, weights can make a big difference. i dont like the physique argument because, and especially for a fighter, its not important. what is important is maintaining your weight while adding strength and power. not training for hypertrophy or mass. two completely different things. skills pay the bills and is what matters. but to just neglect weights s/c altogether is just plain dumb. the athletes now are ten times what they were 50 years ago.

Really? You do know that 50 years ago is only the 60's right? So, today's fighters are ten times these guys?
HW Ali
LHW Jose Torres
MW **** Tiger
WW Emile Griffith
LW Carlos Ortiz
FW flash Elorde or Vincente Saldivar
BW Eder Jofre or Fighting Harada
FW Hiroyuki Ebihara