Iq test

[Spartacus Sully]

Plus i'm pretty sure you need an iq of 145+ to be considered a genius, not 135.

By the way, you seem angry, take a chill pill, it's just an internet forum.

Id say if mensa will take you at 130, 130's genius.

[F A R L A P]

Knowledge an intelligence are two completely different things.

You could have somebody with an IQ of 80 graduate from university, and have somebody with an IQ of 150+ that dropped out of school at a young age.


Anyway, i don't take iq tests seriously, i just answered for the sake of the thread. I don't even think iq tests do an accurate job at mesuring somebody's intelligence. Nobody's mind works the same, and some people might have an easier time solving certain type of problems.

As for my grammar, i like to think it's pretty good considering english is not my native language.

Plus i'm pretty sure you need an iq of 145+ to be considered a genius, not 135.

By the way, you seem angry, take a chill pill, it's just an internet forum.

Not angry, just making a point.

Spelling/gramma was just an example of the unlikeliness in the IQ's of the posters.

And if you all are genisus you should relise the statistical unlikelness of the majority of posters being in the top 2%/.01%.

[Spartacus Sully]

Not angry, just making a point.

Spelling/gramma was just an example of the unlikeliness in the IQ's of the posters.

And if you all are genisus you should relise the statistical unlikelness of the majority of posters being in the top 2%/.01%.

thats .1% not .01%

6 billion *.02 or 2% thats 120 million people.

out of the 120 million people in the world with and iq above 130 whats the chances 5 or 6 of them are on this board?

[Sugarj]

I'm an honest 133 on the test.

The environment wasn't perfect as my son and wife were in and out of the room, but I'm moderately pleased with this score.

[F A R L A P]

thats .1% not .01%

6 billion *.02 or 2% thats 120 million people.

out of the 120 million people in the world with and iq above 130 whats the chances 5 or 6 of them are on this board?

your right my mistake, too used to using calculator

you could look at it like that. or you could look at it as 5/6 posters being in top 2%. .02^4.98?* = ****en small (0.000000 etc)

*Might not be right maths, im not intelligent

[Spartacus Sully]

your right my mistake, too used to using calculator

you could look at it like that. or you could look at it as 5/6 posters being in top 2%. .02^4.98?* = ****en small (0.000000 etc)

*Might not be right maths, im not intelligent

im missing something? 5/6? 83%? where does 4.98 come from? and why would i assume 83% of boxing scene is in the top 2%?

[F A R L A P]

im missing something? 5/6? 83%? where does 4.98 come from?

83% of 6 = 4.98

Im pretty clueless on the maths, all i know is that the probability is tiny.

and why would i assume 83% of boxing scene is in the top 2%?

it's roughly the odds of what users have been posting (what i originaly called bull **** on).

Anyway I stand by my comment that most people on the internet are full of **** (no one wants to be average).

But think what you want to think.

im out

Peace.

[paulsinghnl]

mine was around 125 (123, not sure) when i was in 12th grade of high school, and then last time i did it was a couple of months ago (doing a university education now), i was drunk and i scored 120.

so a university education mixed with boxing and alcohol does make u dumb.

(why did i take an IQ test drunk? no idea..)

[Spartacus Sully]

83% of 6 = 4.98

Im pretty clueless on the maths, all i know is that the probability is tiny.

it's roughly the odds of what users have been posting (what i originaly called bull **** on).

Anyway I stand by my comment that most people on the internet are full of **** (no one wants to be average).

i get it now but id say the the subject of the thread dosnt attract the average. sure its unlikely that on average 5 out of 6 people are in the top 2%

but quite liekly that a thread with iq as the subject attracts the 5 or 6 people out of the 153000 members that are in the top 2%

i agreee though that most people are full of **** internet or not.

[Sugarj]

i get it now but id say the the subject of the thread dosnt attract the average. sure its unlikely that on average 5 out of 6 people are in the top 2%

but quite liekly that a thread with iq as the subject attracts the 5 or 6 people out of the 153000 members that are in the top 2%

i agreee though that most people are full of **** internet or not.

I suppose there is also the thought that only the posters who got decent scores were willing to share them.

Those with average to poor results may well have simply not replied or have been the guys who posted the bull#### responses.