detroit, i HIGHLY HIGHLY doubt ur 250 6ft with 11-13% body fat.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A good size for a heavy weight
Collapse
-
-
at 5'10, its very hard to fight heavyweight. i mean majority of am fighters at heavy are 6'2+
hell im 6'1 and im going to fight middleweight
it has been done before (eg. tyson) but then you have to be a real puncher.
id advise getting in to boxing shape, and seeing where you stand. you may find things work out
good luck
Comment
-
you wonder if these size guidelines are the reason the heavyweight division s*x so bad these days.
Used to be, if you felt game and were in the ballpark of 200lbs, then it was cool to give it a shot.
i'm 5'10; my boxing shape weight is well over 200; though boxing shape doesn't necessarily mean "low bodyfat %age" for me (think fedor emelianenko). I don't have a ton of in-the-gym KOs; but I don't usually have problems with taller guys until they get above 6'4 or 6'5, and then only if they're real quick.
A buddy of mine has a big cross at 5'9 & 160 and absolutely destroyed this guy at 6'6 & 240.
Speed kills and once you get inside, it's time to go to work.
Big bill tate was a solid heavyweight skill-wise. Size wise he'd be considered "big" even by today's standards. He didn't exactly go undefeated either.
James Toney could've had a much better career at heavyweight if he'd bothered to work on conditioning, but was still a contender, and he's officially 5'10 (though shorter than me imho).
Worry about learning your craft & picking up good skills and athleticism won't matter so much.
Comment
-
Comment