Originally posted by SpeedKillz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stance - Square Shoulders v 45 Degrees
Collapse
-
Originally posted by VERSATILE2K7 View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by SpeedKillz View Postoh ok cool that does help i see what ur doing now i do the same thing sometimes but i dont consider that squaring up cuz ur feet are still in position to move at an angle if u need to, and with that kind of torso twisting, if ur good at it, u can make some very troubling angles for ur opponent, if ur fast enough, which from ur fight vid u look like u r. good lookin out vers, thanks.
Comment
-
-
i always thought angled stance gave your opponents less of a target and is better for your jab, angelo dundee used to teach angled stance
but joe frazier said this:
"Note that, when the feet are placed correctly, the upper body is turned, but just slightly. A lot of trainers will tell you that when you are in position, you should angle your upper body with the lead side forward so that your opponent gets a smaller target. That's wrong. How are you supposed to have balance when you're standing sideways? You want to be just about squared up to your opponent, facing him head-on. That's how you stay on balance. That's how you get power. So don't turn sideways. Stand with your shoulders just about straight across. Standing that way gives you more options defensively (block, slip, roll, duck) and it gives you better balance and power"
- Joe Frazier
probably good for frazier's style but he did have an underrated defense...
Comment
-
Originally posted by jas View Posti always thought angled stance gave your opponents less of a target and is better for your jab, angelo dundee used to teach angled stance
but joe frazier said this:
"Note that, when the feet are placed correctly, the upper body is turned, but just slightly. A lot of trainers will tell you that when you are in position, you should angle your upper body with the lead side forward so that your opponent gets a smaller target. That's wrong. How are you supposed to have balance when you're standing sideways? You want to be just about squared up to your opponent, facing him head-on. That's how you stay on balance. That's how you get power. So don't turn sideways. Stand with your shoulders just about straight across. Standing that way gives you more options defensively (block, slip, roll, duck) and it gives you better balance and power"
- Joe Frazier
probably good for frazier's style but he did have an underrated defense...
Comment
-
No trainer teaches squared up unless the body type dictates it!
Squaring up takes balance away, just have someone stand in front of you and use a conventional stance and then square and have your buddy push your shoulders. Not hard and not fast just a shove! You should be able to tell, don't forget to bend in the knees and waist slightly.
Even Cus D'Amato who taught high cheek glove defense along with short stepping to get close didn't want a square look at distance. However when your taught to double right hands (bottom to top) you will bring your right foot up to be able to drop weight on them to add more power!
Fighters who are good at this method must remain low in their stance and maintain their head moves that go with their punches.
When Cus's fighters would get into trouble they would standing up to often and then forgetting their head rotations when working in combinations.
As I've said before the pressure guys have as much if not more to learn to excel and be in as good or better condition to maintain pressure!
I understand what Frazier was commenting on, Joe needed to bring the back foot up to perform his rotations underneath. Could you imagine Ali squared up? Ha!
Ray.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peterp View PostI see more and more pro boxers who fight with their shoulders basically square to their opponent
Just this weekend we had Cotto and Mormeck fight from these kind of stances
Advantage is you can launch a right hand lead as easily as the jab, a right hook as easily as a left hook
disadvantage is your right hand won't be as powerful
Thoughts ?
Comment
Comment