Whats better?to run 6 miles?or 3 miles at a fast timed pace? for conditioning

[PunchDrunk]

I was doing 2:30 800 metres when I was 11 so The 4 * 800 metres I should do no bother. Also 6 miles at a strong pace I figure would be better than 3 miles at a strong pace

At 11??? I guess you missed out on a great track and field career...

A "strong pace" at 3 miles is faster than a strong pace at 6 miles. Higher intensity > longer distance.

[Run]

Higher intensity > longer distance.

Always.

And I try and use the example that distance activities that "Keep your heat in the target zone LOL" are modified versions of a brisk Jane Fonda walk. That aint going to do **** for your conditioning.

Running as fast as you can for a mile > Jogging 3 miles.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[Verstyle]

At 11??? I guess you missed out on a great track and field career...

A "strong pace" at 3 miles is faster than a strong pace at 6 miles. Higher intensity > longer distance.

Thats not to fast of an 800m When I was 11(really active in track) I used to run the 1600m(mile) in 5:30. I dont know what happened now.

[potatoes]

Yeah I know how to run,I was in track for 7 years,I was a sprinter. But under 18min? I gotta take a pic of that hill,so u guys will see what im talking about.****s no joke.I makes ppl on bikes get tired.

All times are dependent on the situation. The best thing to do is keep track of your times and try to improve by a few seconds every week. It won't take long before you are the fastest boxer in Texas!

[Mick Hucknall]

I was best in Scotland btw and top 3 in the UK. I continued until I was 13 then became disinterested. I could do a mile in just over 5 minutes