who would have won george vs. george

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike Tyson Jr.
    **** u til u luv me
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2005
    • 2483
    • 311
    • 154
    • 9,207

    #1

    who would have won george vs. george

    who would have won
    if old foreman at 45 went back in time
    and fought the young foreman that
    was champ in the 1970s.



    yeah yeah snarfy snarf
  • Mr. Ryan
    Guest
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2004
    • 23429
    • 1,301
    • 1,089
    • 29,664

    #2
    Teddy Atlas once said that the old George Foreman would've knocked out the younger George Foreman because the older Foreman had become a master of mind games. He was smarter and more self-aware of his faults as a fighter. Age certainly has it's priveledges, and Foreman's older age also had it's negative effects as well. The Foreman of old wasn't able to sustain a consistent offense after the fourth, but was able to lull his opponents into a sense of security, sometimes a false one. The young Foreman also encountered something like that in Zaire 32 years ago. I would say the older Foreman, he was the much smarter fighter.

    Comment

    • Shanus
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2006
      • 14918
      • 997
      • 1,217
      • 18,545

      #3
      The Foreman of '45' wouldn't beat the younger version, but the Foreman of 1990 would have competed, I couldn't call it though.

      Comment

      • NJFighter91
        #1 P4P Heavyweight
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2006
        • 1706
        • 57
        • 49
        • 8,467

        #4
        i go with younger

        Comment

        • -Antonio-
          -Antonio-
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2005
          • 24259
          • 629
          • 163
          • 38,153

          #5
          Foreman claims the older version would have beaten the younger version. I dotn buy it. Young Foreman was a beast.

          Comment

          • leff
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2004
            • 5141
            • 218
            • 108
            • 14,047

            #6
            id go for the young one, kinda logical that a 25 year old version of a guy beats the 45 year old one.

            btw im glad you finaly made a decent thread cheers

            Comment

            • Derranged_
              Lomachicken skurred
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Sep 2004
              • 10193
              • 815
              • 2,233
              • 1,215

              #7
              I'm picking the older George Foreman. The old version IMO fought a much smarter boxing match by pacing himself, choosing his openings and not punching himself out, and being more defensive minded.

              Old George weathers an early storm by Young George, and opens up in the mid to late rounds scoring a TKO or UD. Remember, the 'old'(olds a relative term!) George Foreman fought alot of big punchers and good boxers but was never stopped or even knocked down.

              Comment

              • Abe Attell
                Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2006
                • 2226
                • 75
                • 0
                • 8,860

                #8
                I pick the younger Foreman:

                People say George was slow, but I really don't think so...when he was young, he wasn't that slow, especially compared to his older days (where he was slow)...I think it is more from seeing him winding up his punches, so since you saw him pull all the way back, you knew it was coming...the Old Foreman still took far to much punishment, and that would be some serious bruising fighting the younger...George could also go many rounds of what seemed to be non-stop punching, but it is the Ali fight, where he ran out of gas, that people remember the most. Of course you are going to run out of gas if you keep throwing that many punches and are throwing that many power shots; I think it may have been hot/humid during the fight, not sure...If he would of just paced himself a little more, nobody would talk about his "Stamina problem."

                One big thing, George Foreman, despite his size/height, was a vicious body puncher.

                I just think the younger Foreman would be a bit much to handle...his arsenal/varitey of punches were quite amazing, and although Archie Moore helped him out, it is a shame he couldn't find the "right" trainer to fit him
                Last edited by Abe Attell; 11-18-2006, 07:06 PM.

                Comment

                • dino
                  BOXINGSCENE king
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 4319
                  • 401
                  • 12
                  • 11,146

                  #9
                  young george foreman fought like a bear..older george foreman was a better fighter eventhough fat..i think its a toss up fight

                  Comment

                  • Southpaw Stinger
                    Trousersnake Fondler
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 25730
                    • 947
                    • 536
                    • 37,838

                    #10
                    I'd go with younger. Maybe old Foreman would have the right strategy to beat young, but I doubt he'd be able to pull it off.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP