Barerra too shook to fight Pacquiao

[Roberto_Roldan_]

damn i was wrong alright well i think he should fight barrera and then go for the 5th div.....

[daggerdeux]

Look at his record. An early loss, a title loss, a unification draw and then the road to the Barrera fight. After which he lost and drew once again. His prior career was not as constant as Barrera's and his subsequent career hasn't been. You are mistaken. Barrera has reeled off wins since that fight and Manny has had stutter steps, it is clear to see.

Plus he did stay on in the division after the Sanchez loss.

Just for the record, Benny Leonard, Ted "kid " Lewis, Billy Conn, Henry Armstrong, Bernard Hopkins, Manuel Ortiz all lost their first fight and so does Alexis Arguello by 1st round TKO.

[JoartCC2]

Now i know you're talking b*llocks! So what are you going to write when Barrera does face Pacquiao again? Which as i've stated plain and basically on a few occasions that i do think will happen. That has always been my opinion despite the time scale and the excuses that you **** on about, the most pathetic being that Barrera hides behind De La Hoya's skirt!
I think you're problem is that you don't understand the concept of something you seem to print quite a bit... 'Plain and basic' common ****in sense!
I'll give you my opinion one last time... I believe that Barrera and Pacquiao will fight again, despite the excuses, and despite the time scale.

That's is your belief. ANd I'm not interested in changing that. I do believe that MAB will still fight PAC and probably do a no-man just to save face.

A true warrior will always try to redeem himself at the earliest possible oppurtunity. And never wait 3 years just to prove a point. Use plain and basic common sense. The last time Merchant mentioned the name of PAC, one can easily see he immediately stutters and shakes. lols! Hard to admit but that's a fact.

What I'm just saying is that a few months ago, this site is buzzing with PAC haters and dumbos who said this and that, most of them are gone. ***** MAB had the guts to call PAC a MOrales leftover but when PAC issued a challenge that MAB back his insult up, all he ever did was run hiding in Hoya's skirt.

Those are the facts.

[JoartCC2]

isnt he a 2 div champ? but yeah it would be sweet if he won another title he would be in THOF for sure!

Belts are of little use to PAC. Learn your history. He doesn't need the belts to be a somebody. Which is I think good. It's about time someone abolished those ****** belts. There's so many one could see the folly of it.

[Roberto_Roldan_]

Belts are of little use to PAC. Learn your history. He doesn't need the belts to be a somebody. Which is I think good. It's about time someone abolished those ****** belts. There's so many one could see the folly of it.

You think so huh? IS not about the belt I know but you come in here talking like is pac was ur best friend and knew how he thinks but, you dont know **** son. YOur boxing is too lil to talk boxing seriously. You make comments seem like Facts but in every sentence you finish by saying its a fact it aint you would like them to be but some arent.

[Roberto_Roldan_]

I say ur boy is a HOF and the next thing i know u start bashing me with no reason.

[loui_ludwig]

You think so huh? IS not about the belt I know but you come in here talking like is pac was ur best friend and knew how he thinks but, you dont know **** son. YOur boxing is too lil to talk boxing seriously. You make comments seem like Facts but in every sentence you finish by saying its a fact it aint you would like them to be but some arent.

Hey bro, just a little hint, his not a Pac nuthugger or a Pacfan. His a Pac nut swallower.

[JoartCC2]

You think so huh? IS not about the belt I know but you come in here talking like is pac was ur best friend and knew how he thinks but, you dont know **** son. YOur boxing is too lil to talk boxing seriously. You make comments seem like Facts but in every sentence you finish by saying its a fact it aint you would like them to be but some arent.

Those are the facts.

Care to to dispute that?

The problem with you ****** is that you got nothing in your brains but rascist comments. lols! That's why you're brain's empty.

[JoartCC2]

Hey bro, just a little hint, his not a Pac nuthugger or a Pacfan. His a Pac nut swallower.

Ahh... Shut up kid. I'm not talking to you. Mind your own business.

[Franko]

That's is your belief. ANd I'm not interested in changing that. I do believe that MAB will still fight PAC and probably do a no-man just to save face.

A true warrior will always try to redeem himself at the earliest possible oppurtunity. And never wait 3 years just to prove a point. Use plain and basic common sense. The last time Merchant mentioned the name of PAC, one can easily see he immediately stutters and shakes. lols! Hard to admit but that's a fact.

What I'm just saying is that a few months ago, this site is buzzing with PAC haters and dumbos who said this and that, most of them are gone. ***** MAB had the guts to call PAC a MOrales leftover but when PAC issued a challenge that MAB back his insult up, all he ever did was run hiding in Hoya's skirt.

Those are the facts.

Do you practice being an ar*ehole or does it just come naturally. You're ****ing on again about plain and basic common sense and yet you state that you do believe that MAB will fight PAC again which is the point i have made in each post, again, regardless of the time scale and excuses, which i couldn't give two ****s about. Do you agree with me that Barrera will fight Pacquiao for a 2nd time? If so let's leave it at that.