Barerra too shook to fight Pacquiao

[Bonsi]

the part in bold made me laugh...............at how ****** that statement is, barreras legacy tainted by pac...lol

barrera could retire tomorrow, NEVER fight pac again and would still enter the hall of fame and still have had a better career than manny pacquiao, your lucky barrera gave pacman a chance when they fought in november 2003. its because of barrera pacman is known by a wider audience.

your talkin about barrera not takin a rematch yet, like i and others have said barrera is still an active fighter and he will fight him when he is ready....not when you want him to fight your god pacman.

and speaking of *****, are you gonna call pacman a ***** for not avenging his earlier defeats in his career?? i havent heard pacman call out the 2 guys he lost too earlier in his career and if i remember correctly he lost by BRUTAL KO and his eyes were rolling all over the place when he got knocked out, why isnt pacman callin him out for a rematch?? is he a *****, just like you think barrera is because he hasnt fought a rematch with the people that kicked his ass and KO'd him???

The bolded part made me fart....on how ****** that statement is...

[daggerdeux]

I thought the Juarez match-up was wrong, he beat the guy first time out, why bow to pressure to go right back into it when you are better than the guy, it gave us fans a glorified exhibtion this weekend (no disprespect to Juarez and his fans). Barrera should see if Manny loses to Erik, Marco has taken care of his business with Morales, if Manny loses he can force him into a fight after that and Manny will get less money as he will be coming off a loss and going for Marco's titles.

Morales can certainly beat Manny, we do agree on something

I strongly feel it is wrong for Marco to be called a *****.

The difference is Morales belived in his excuses and BArrera did not that why BArrera is a *****. If he actually believe it, he would have rematch Pac anytime.
Juarez first fight was close and Barrera does not want to leave any doubt and of course I believe he knows he can beat Juarez that's why he fought him again right away.

[amaru]

Barrera is going to HOF, no doubt but If Barrera will not fight PAc again, believe me, Pac will forever be mention after his name and his excuses will forever be an excuses. Barrera is HOF and was annihilated by another HOF and, so avenging will be huge for Barrera. How the **** you gonna tell me that's the same as Pac avenging his defeats to those 2 nobodies> you are a ****** muthaf.

so whats worse then??? losing to 2 unheard of **** fighters, or as you put it and i quote... "2 nobodies" or losing to a HOF fighter in pacquiao???

if i was a boxer id rather lose to a good/great fighter then 2 nobodies....whose the ****** muthaf now

[daggerdeux]

so whats worse then??? losing to 2 unheard of **** fighters, or as you put it and i quote... "2 nobodies" or losing to a HOF fighter in pacquiao???

if i was a boxer id rather lose to a good/great fighter then 2 nobodies....whose the ****** muthaf now

We are talking about avenging defeats. How the **** you gonna tell me that Barrera avenging his defeat aganist Pac is the same way as Pac avenging his defeat to a couple of nobodies.

[Bogler]

Guys, before it gets said let me state this:

The only nuts I hold are my own, to stop them slapping against your womans/mums legs

I'm joking by the way, it is a good response to this 'nut hugging' insult.

you're not a nuthugger? well ok, but neither are you a true boxing fan. you only recognize boxers you root for and downplay their opponents in case your heroes got beat. belittling PAC's career and recent achievements will have most boxing experts laugh at you. the guy was a world title holder in 2 divisions prior to facing MAB. it was only his 2nd fight at featherweight when he faced MAB yet he gave him a thorough onesided beating.

[daggerdeux]

you're not a nuthugger? well ok, but neither are you a true boxing fan. you only recognize boxers you root for and downplay their opponents in case your heroes got beat. belittling PAC's career and recent achievements will have most boxing experts laugh at you. the guy was a world title holder in 2 divisions prior to facing MAB. it was only his 2nd fight at featherweight when he faced MAB yet he gave him a thorough onesided beating.

That ***** got the nerves to use staccato, flash in the span to belittle PAc. He forgot to do his homework.

[Vanilla Gorilla]

Without reading any posts on this thread...

From watching Sat nights snooze fest against Juarez I dont think Barrera can hang in the ring with Pac.

I just dont see it. He should retire, if he fights Pac he will GET RETIRED.

[amaru]

We are talking about avenging defeats. How the **** you gonna tell me that Barrera avenging his defeat aganist Pac is the same way as Pac avenging his defeat to a couple of nobodies.

pac got knocked the **** out in 1 of his losses and he lost another fight too before losing to morales, if your caling barrera a ***** for not immediately rematchin pacman, then im calling pacman a ***** for not avenging his losses......immediately, you cant call out barrera for being a ***** and not pacman just because it suits you, seeing as thats your logic of thinking with barrera, i assume you think pacman is a ***** too right???

[Nacho_Analstain]

Without reading any posts on this thread...

From watching Sat nights snooze fest against Juarez I dont think Barrera can hang in the ring with Pac.

I just dont see it. He should retire, if he fights Pac he will GET RETIRED.

i agree,and a legend like barrera shouldnt go out like that

[daggerdeux]

pac got knocked the **** out in 1 of his losses and he lost another fight too before losing to morales, if your caling barrera a ***** for not immediately rematchin pacman, then im calling pacman a ***** for not avenging his losses......immediately, you cant call out barrera for being a ***** and not pacman just because it suits you, seeing as thats your logic of thinking with barrera, i assume you think pacman is a ***** too right???

Barrera made those excuses 3 years ago and get this in your peanut brain, 3 years later his excuses were still excuses. In other words, he is a *****, he knows Pac would **** him up again.

The fight against JMM was draw, get your facts straight. and the judge admitted made a mistake and the rematch would have been great. PAc was willing to settle the score and JMM pussied out.

Think cognitively and use your frontal lobe, Barrera avenging his loss to Pac is not the same as Pac avenging his lossess to nobodies. We are talking about legacies here where greatness measured against great fighters.