Originally posted by daggerdeux
Dempsey beats anybody
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TheEvilSaintjack was fighting on a stomach that was empty for about a week. it is possible that he took a dive, too. but ive heard both stories. he needed money at the time, so a dive is not out of the question.
In a competitive sport loses are inevitable. Back in Jack Dempsey's day losing was not considered to be the end of the world. Today boxing has become a highly managed sport where a losing is a very bad idea when there are so many uncompetitive fights. Vitali Klitschko have great looking record, but this is largely against hand picked opponents. Jack Dempsey had to fight to live, and some of his fights were ill-timed and ill-advised, problems that Vitali Klitachko never had to deal with. The keyboard warriors make a big deal of Dempsey loss to Flynn, a much smaller man and conclude from that he would have no chance against Vitali Klitschko. That is a dubious train of logic. Styles make fights, and Klitschko's style is similir to Jess Willard. Dempsey had no problem with Willard and he would have no problem with Klitschko.Comment
-
"The Great Trainers and Fighters on Dempsey: Simply The Best"
Stay updated with the latest boxing news, fight results, interviews, and rankings. Get real-time coverage of upcoming bouts, analysis, and exclusive insights from the world of boxing.
Exactly what the title says. Trainers alive during Dempsey's era who witnessed him firsthand and who are still alive today argue Dempsey's greatness and plausible dominance of the sport at present times.Comment
-
Originally posted by La_ViboraFor those you of that never saw Jack Dempsey fight(obviously a few on this board):
Jack fighting George Carpentier:
His fight agains the 6'6 245lbs Jess Willard who beat Jack Johnson btw:
Comment
-
Originally posted by HEAVYWEIGHT BOXDempsay should not be mentioned in the same breath as modern fighters. He must be one of the tiniest men I have ever seen.
The only reason that he is mentioned is due to Wladimir Klitschko - glass Wlad - being a champ.
Dempsay KO glass Wlad 1. No-one argues with this.
But compare Dempsay to a decent man sized man, and his china chin gets cracked EARLY.
Hell, a ****ing fireman knocked him COLD!
yeah, it'd be great if you never posted againComment
-
Originally posted by HEAVYWEIGHT BOXDempsay should not be mentioned in the same breath as modern fighters. He must be one of the tiniest men I have ever seen.
The only reason that he is mentioned is due to Wladimir Klitschko - glass Wlad - being a champ.
Dempsay KO glass Wlad 1. No-one argues with this.
But compare Dempsay to a decent man sized man, and his china chin gets cracked EARLY.
Hell, a ****ing fireman knocked him COLD!Comment
-
Dempsey is a superb well conditioned atlete and there's no question that he can be competitive against anybody in this modern day of the sports, but it's just that the phrase "Demsey beats anybody" is simply super HYPE and ridiculous.Comment
-
Originally posted by psychopathDempsey is a superb well conditioned atlete and there's no question that he can be competitive against anybody in this modern day of the sports, but it's just that the phrase "Demsey beats anybody" is simply super HYPE and ridiculous.
Well, of course, nobody in their right mind believes Jack Dempsey would beat George Foreman or Sonny Liston. But he could lick the Klitschko ******* without even breathing hard.Comment
-
Originally posted by potatoesWell, of course, nobody in their right mind believes Jack Dempsey would beat George Foreman or Sonny Liston. But he could lick the Klitschko ******* without even breathing hard.
But he could lick the Klitschko's *******?
I have no problem if that's your honest opinion dude. You should have used that title instead of "Dempsey beats anybody".Comment
Comment