Bert Sugar's Top 100 Fighters Of All Time...

[THE REAL NINJA]

Whitaker is just simply way too low, thats a damn shame.

that's what i thought at first . the only thing you can take from him is the fact that he had ZERO power so maybe that's why

[THE REAL NINJA]

Will I seem ignorant if I ask who the f*** Lou Ambers is? lol joke!!!!!!

lol he's a hall of fame lightweight champ from 40's or somewhere around that time

[Shanus]

would Floyd Mayweather make the list if he retires tomorrow?

Yeah, pretty easily.

[LiLHopkins]

Who the f*** is Lew Jenkins?

[joenypr]

There are lots of names i dont know on this list

[Mike Tyson77]

I can't believe Tyson and Holyfield are so low on the list. They could whoop nearly everyone on there and both had amazing careers. Holyfield should be at least top 10 P4P and Tyson should be a little higher than 100, c'mon.

[Azteca]

hagler too high, hearns too high. tyson shouldn't even be in there. whitaker is much too high.

[ferocity]

why is julio caesar chavez number 17? that's way to generous, he's before names like archie moore and sugar ray leonard....that's bs.

Unlike you Bert Sugar has seen Chavez through out his career not just in the late 90's.

[TonyRingside]

hagler too high, hearns too high. tyson shouldn't even be in there. whitaker is much too high.

what do you mean hagler too high? he's the second best middleweight ever behind robinson

[-Antonio-]

I can't believe Tyson and Holyfield are so low on the list. They could whoop nearly everyone on there and both had amazing careers. Holyfield should be at least top 10 P4P and Tyson should be a little higher than 100, c'mon.

He was being extremely generous with Holyfield imo. Tyson could have been anywhere between 80-100 and it sounds about right. A lot of these fighters all I know is their accomplishments since a lot of them are old school.