This still gets brought up in nearly every Hatton threads, so let's have a show of hands to see who thinks who won.
I have to admit, when I first saw the fight, I thought Hatton got a gift.
So I watched it again and paid closer attention to my scorepad. Now, as well as Collazo did from the southpaw stance (and he DID do well) he didn't, ISTR, even start getting involved in the fight until the fifth round. So the fight's entering the fifth, and he's already five points down with the first round KD. All Hatton has to do from rounds 5-12 is stay on his feet and win just TWO more rounds and he wins the fight, 114-113. Unless you disagree with Hatton winning the first four, that's simple mathematics. It was close, maybe he was lucky not to have KD called (though he didn't directly go down from a punch, so...) but he won the fight, fair and square.
But what say you?
I have to admit, when I first saw the fight, I thought Hatton got a gift.
So I watched it again and paid closer attention to my scorepad. Now, as well as Collazo did from the southpaw stance (and he DID do well) he didn't, ISTR, even start getting involved in the fight until the fifth round. So the fight's entering the fifth, and he's already five points down with the first round KD. All Hatton has to do from rounds 5-12 is stay on his feet and win just TWO more rounds and he wins the fight, 114-113. Unless you disagree with Hatton winning the first four, that's simple mathematics. It was close, maybe he was lucky not to have KD called (though he didn't directly go down from a punch, so...) but he won the fight, fair and square.
But what say you?
Comment