Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did Mayweather weight bully Pacquiao on fight night?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Real King Kong View Post
    Makes sense. He was so severely dehydrated he needed an IV...obviously due to the 40lbs of water weight he cut.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by djtmal View Post
      I said a good referee not a different one.

      Oh so I guess it's safe to say this "different" referee was accustomed to Floyd excessively clinching even though it's something fighters get warned about and get points taken for.

      A good referee isn't going allow Floyd to excessively clinch the ridicilous amount of times he did irregardless of if Manny works inside or not.
      Well he didn’t really excessively clinch and regardless it’s the digression of the ref. Clinching is a part of Boxing.

      You made the statement as if Pacquaio would work inside when he’s never done that so it’s a moot point.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by IceTrayDaGang View Post
        well.. who's another WW that is the same size or smaller than manny? pac at 147 has always been the smaller guy against the other 147... even when pac fights guys moving up from 140 to 147, pac still ends up being the smaller guy!
        Upper body/frame he looks smaller than all but guys like Paulie. But from the hips down/lower body? Pacquiao over almost every single one. Hell, dude looked about as big as Cotto...I’d even say he looked more impressive. He looked the same as Bradley. Thicker than Matthysse. Thicker than Broner. *Significantly* thicker than Vargas and Algieri.

        Stop trolling man. Being a “smaller” and shorter WW doesn’t make him any less of a WW. Pacquiao is a downright impressive looking human. He is every bit of 146-147 pounds. Zero excess on that man.

        He may be small*ER* than Spence and Brook and Porter and Bud (who would weigh at some super ww like weights even at 35) and Horn but those guys are also exceptional for the weight class. Smaller than SOME WWs doesn’t mean you’re an undersized WW.

        Comment


        • #74
          It was six years ago. The better fighter won. Get over it.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by LeOoze View Post
            name the rounds pac won
            rounds 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10. don't have to elaborate it here.. just watch closely that rounds without you bias mindset. but i doubt coz you love floyd so much.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by pasawayako View Post
              see the size difference in my sig. floyd was bigger but also a bigger target for pac.
              lmao

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by blowblow View Post
                rounds 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10. don't have to elaborate it here.. just watch closely that rounds without you bias mindset. but i doubt coz you love floyd so much.
                You just opened yourself up like a can.

                I just watched round 2 you have no fckn idea, Manny was lucky to land 3 shots, now I see what you scoring lol go learn some boxing because you have no clue how to score a boxing match lol.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by blowblow View Post
                  rounds 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10. don't have to elaborate it here.. just watch closely that rounds without you bias mindset. but i doubt coz you love floyd so much.
                  That's the rounds that pac clearly won that's why it was clear as day that pac won the fight.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                    Well he didn’t really excessively clinch and regardless it’s the digression of the ref. Clinching is a part of Boxing.

                    You made the statement as if Pacquaio would work inside when he’s never done that so it’s a moot point.
                    He didn't really excessively clinch;? its the digression of the ref; ?gtfoh. What fight were you watching.

                    He clinched over 100x, including initiating a clinch from about five feet away without throwing a punch, and was on top of the man's back at least 2x. You think the ref was inclined to give Floyd a warning after, I don't know, maybe the 50th clinch?

                    This is a Floyd Boy first. Making up excuses for the biased ref.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      No. Yes. Maybe. It was ages ago.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP