Comments Thread For: Liam Williams: I'm Going To Smash Demetrius Andrade, Hurt Him Bad!

[nubianpiye]

Williams is a good fighter and entertaining but Andrade is a different class and will beat him easily.

[Sid-Knee]

you took 3 days to come back with yet another irrelevant reply? Like I said, I control this narrative not you. So you trying to copy and paste posts you’ve had from previous debates with others and pretending it applies here won’t work with me. I posed questions to you specifically relating to my point and you couldn’t answer them. Below heavyweight, U.K. fighters get washed by elite fighters. Hell, warrington got washed by a journeyman. Canelo has spent much of the last 5 years avoiding the biggest threats and facing mediocre brits instead. Your gold medalist can’t even beat an Instagram boxer.
Oh, And yes, the U.K. is responsible for spreading COVID variants and were actually responsible for bringing the original version into NY. Dirtbags.

I know you're trying to control the narrative. But you're failing really badly. You could just put up the collective resumes of your fighters, but you know how wrong you are so you're deflecting and projecting. Go back and see your reply saying" Show me these elite UK talents and their resumes. I could do with a good laugh"

I gave you the resumes. You're not laughing now though are you? Where are the Americans resumes? Put them up and put me in my place like you deluded yourself you would.

I'm still waiting little man. Do so, and i'll smack you about on the other points too. But you're just backing away like a typical American coward. Jesus do you clowns need some courage and conviction behind your words. It's just embarrassing for you little man. Or, just run away like you lot do and avoid because you've failed.

It's up to you. But coming back with nothing all the time is too sad for words. But i get it. You're desperate and your fragile ego has been trampled on. I'll continue to trample on it whenever i want. Why? Because you're too easy. Just like the rest of you plonkers. All bark, no bite.

[BoloShot]

Below heavyweight, basically every UK fighter other than maybe Taylor is all talk with limited skill. Most can’t deal with a pressure fighter nor can they deal with a skilled boxer. They’re basically record padders for the better boxers.

Warrington is a legit top fighter but Lara proved that upsets happen to anyone if the styles mesh a certain way. I'd say Kid Galahad has that nasty streak in him too to be able to hang at the top level. I thought he beat Warrington handily and he destroyed Marrero.

[rrayvez]

I know you're trying to control the narrative. But you're failing really badly. You could just put up the collective resumes of your fighters, but you know how wrong you are so you're deflecting and projecting. Go back and see your reply saying" Show me these elite UK talents and their resumes. I could do with a good laugh"

I gave you the resumes. You're not laughing now though are you? Where are the Americans resumes? Put them up and put me in my place like you deluded yourself you would.

I'm still waiting little man. Do so, and i'll smack you about on the other points too. But you're just backing away like a typical American coward. Jesus do you clowns need some courage and conviction behind your words. It's just embarrassing for you little man. Or, just run away like you lot do and avoid because you've failed.

It's up to you. But coming back with nothing all the time is too sad for words. But i get it. You're desperate and your fragile ego has been trampled on. I'll continue to trample on it whenever i want. Why? Because you're too easy. Just like the rest of you plonkers. All bark, no bite.

your collective resume list ****** and lost all credibility when you described wins vs lemieux, eubank jr and others as elite wins. Gtfoh. So aside from it being irrelevant to my topic, it didn’t even have credible substance. My question to you was a legit question and had everything to do with my original post. So again, answer the question or come back every 3 days with a weak reply and I can continue to remind you that I control this narrative, not you.

[alexguiness]

Liam Williams is a lot better than most give him credit for.

As for Andrade, I can't see anything to back up the hype train behind him?

All he has is a few wins over some European guys whose style would be easy for him.

[Sid-Knee]

your collective resume list ****** and lost all credibility when you described wins vs lemieux, eubank jr and others as elite wins. Gtfoh. So aside from it being irrelevant to my topic, it didn’t even have credible substance. My question to you was a legit question and had everything to do with my original post. So again, answer the question or come back every 3 days with a weak reply and I can continue to remind you that I control this narrative, not you.

So all of them are worthless wins? Haha. Classic. Don't put up the resumes of your guys, just attack with madness and discrediting. I do wish your characteristics were different to the majority from your land little man, but it's too much for you.

I've already clowned your original post. Not my fault your insecurity can't handle the truth little man. But i'll happily go over it with you considering i've already dominated the other point you've been too scared to answer and do nothing but deflect.

So, who are these elite Americans beating elite fighters in a way you say Brits can't? Answer that, then i'll correct you on the Brits and laugh at your list of madness i know you're going to put. You're aware of it being bad, otherwise you wouldn't have been so scared to put the resumes down. That will do for now until a rip you apart again.

I'm going to have some serious fun with you. Watch those contradictions and the hypocrisy you lot are so fond of. Try and keep the embarrassment down to a minimum. You've already done too much as it is and can't afford any more. But that's just too bad little man isn't it when you talk the way you do? But you'll get dominated which is just the nature of the beast for you clowns.

See you soon. Little man.

[rrayvez]

So all of them are worthless wins? Haha. Classic. Don't put up the resumes of your guys, just attack with madness and discrediting. I do wish your characteristics were different to the majority from your land little man, but it's too much for you.

I've already clowned your original post. Not my fault your insecurity can't handle the truth little man. But i'll happily go over it with you considering i've already dominated the other point you've been too scared to answer and do nothing but deflect.

So, who are these elite Americans beating elite fighters in a way you say Brits can't? Answer that, then i'll correct you on the Brits and laugh at your list of madness i know you're going to put. You're aware of it being bad, otherwise you wouldn't have been so scared to put the resumes down. That will do for now until a rip you apart again.

I'm going to have some serious fun with you. Watch those contradictions and the hypocrisy you lot are so fond of. Try and keep the embarrassment down to a minimum. You've already done too much as it is and can't afford any more. But that's just too bad little man isn't it when you talk the way you do? But you'll get dominated which is just the nature of the beast for you clowns.

See you soon. Little man.

none of your posts or irrelevant questions get addressed as you have still not answered my pertinent question. The truth remains, British fighters below heavyweight are record padders for countries with superior boxers. I listed fighters in just about every weight class from 175 down to 126 and all you’ve done is whine like a b***h and over glorified trash wins from years and years ago. You can’t win this argument. You have inferior boxers now and historically. Period!

[Sid-Knee]

none of your posts or irrelevant questions get addressed as you have still not answered my pertinent question. The truth remains, British fighters below heavyweight are record padders for countries with superior boxers. I listed fighters in just about every weight class from 175 down to 126 and all you’ve done is whine like a b***h and over glorified trash wins from years and years ago. You can’t win this argument. You have inferior boxers now and historically. Period!

You need to read your original post little man. Your deflections are now just constant and insane. In your last post you claimed the list of wins were not "Elite", nor are the fighters "Elite", so i want to know where the bar is on who you consider "Elite" over there, and their "Elite" wins. You get it now? But you won't answer little man.

I've already addressed the situation about fighters who are supposed to lose and not win. Every nation has them. I gave you a good idea with a list of American fighters, but you continue to think this is exclusive to only us.

Lets start with the name Fielding. We'll do one fighter at a time little man.

Fielding is not world level. But even after having a weight restriction against him, you consider this to be exclusive to only us, and is something of a crime in losing to Canelo. Fielding wasn't supposed to win the fight. So, who beats Canelo over there in the US? Plant? Benevidez? Andrade? Charlo? Even though these fighters haven't proven anything little man, would you consider American fighters to be resume padders for better fighters around the world and you in fact join us in being a nation of resume padders?

This is your original "Point". But if you keep on deflecting to other points to stack the deck because you realise you're in trouble, then you're a coward who refuses to answer anything just like a typical American. Other points in your first post include Brits having no skill and being all talk. You also say they can't deal with pressure or skill.

Go back and read your original "Point" little man. Then keep on reading to see your second "Point" in your second post about the elite fighters and their resumes and how you could do with a good laugh little man.

But every time i put anything to you, you coward, you deflect and refuse to answer even though you keep on claiming i'm not willing to answer your original point. So you can't even read any of your original points little man, even though you wrote them.

I'll dominate like i have been doing every step of the way. Your delusions and cowardice with all your insane deflections won't help you. It's either deflections like i said it would be, or you run away. They're your only options little man.

[rrayvez]

You need to read your original post little man. Your deflections are now just constant and insane. In your last post you claimed the list of wins were not "Elite", nor are the fighters "Elite", so i want to know where the bar is on who you consider "Elite" over there, and their "Elite" wins. You get it now? But you won't answer little man.

I've already addressed the situation about fighters who are supposed to lose and not win. Every nation has them. I gave you a good idea with a list of American fighters, but you continue to think this is exclusive to only us.

Lets start with the name Fielding. We'll do one fighter at a time little man.

Fielding is not world level. But even after having a weight restriction against him, you consider this to be exclusive to only us, and is something of a crime in losing to Canelo. Fielding wasn't supposed to win the fight. So, who beats Canelo over there in the US? Plant? Benevidez? Andrade? Charlo? Even though these fighters haven't proven anything little man, would you consider American fighters to be resume padders for better fighters around the world and you in fact join us in being a nation of resume padders?

This is your original "Point". But if you keep on deflecting to other points to stack the deck because you realise you're in trouble, then you're a coward who refuses to answer anything just like a typical American. Other points in your first post include Brits having no skill and being all talk. You also say they can't deal with pressure or skill.

Go back and read your original "Point" little man. Then keep on reading to see your second "Point" in your second post about the elite fighters and their resumes and how you could do with a good laugh little man.

But every time i put anything to you, you coward, you deflect and refuse to answer even though you keep on claiming i'm not willing to answer your original point. So you can't even read any of your original points little man, even though you wrote them.

I'll dominate like i have been doing every step of the way. Your delusions and cowardice with all your insane deflections won't help you. It's either deflections like i said it would be, or you run away. They're your only options little man.

you’ve still addressed nothing from my original post and at this point, you’re only still responding because you think you’re salvaging some dignity, but the reality is you’re only making yourself look more and more desperate and pathetic. British fighters are getting smacked around left and right below hw and as I said, Canelo has spent the past several years scamming the boxing public by beating limited British fighters who have primarily made their names by beating other limited British talent. Below heavyweight British boxers are not elite in any way. Accept it for what it is. Your long ass rants won’t change that truth.

[Sid-Knee]

you’ve still addressed nothing from my original post and at this point, you’re only still responding because you think you’re salvaging some dignity, but the reality is you’re only making yourself look more and more desperate and pathetic. British fighters are getting smacked around left and right below hw and as I said, Canelo has spent the past several years scamming the boxing public by beating limited British fighters who have primarily made their names by beating other limited British talent. Below heavyweight British boxers are not elite in any way. Accept it for what it is. Your long ass rants won’t change that truth.

I've done nothing but address the madness from your original post. But you've deflected and used your strawman argument like i said you would little man. You just don't have the self-awareness to acknowledge it because you're a failure in life with a narcissistic personality disorder. You're also a natural born coward like most Americans.

Your deflection was "Which British fighters beat the list of American fighters i've listed" to try and stack the deck and use a strawman to "Prove" a point on the other things you wrote, even though it has no connection to any of the points you made. That's what a strawman is. Learn what a strawman is you intellectual window licker.

You also used a fallacy when stacking the deck. You said Brits are resume fillers like it was exclusive to us and no one else. But you included the world when it comes to competition with us. But when it came to you, you shut the world out and only included British fighters as competition. That is not a like for like situation. It's a fallacy and a strawman, little man. If you spent money on an education little man instead of piles of guns, you would have a chance to be normal like me. But instead, you've chosen to expose yourself like most from your asylum of a country do, and get dominated because you're a joke.

If you want me to list the fighters who beat the names on your strawman argument, then i'll have to do a like for like in a way you did with us, and include the world.

But i'll do a like for like and use a strawman argument like you did...

Which American beats Kal Yafai or Paul Butler at Bantemweight?
Which American beats Charlie Edwards at SuperFlyWeight?
Which American beats Okolie at Cruiserweight? I rest my case.

See what a fallacy and a strawman is you backwards idiot? Or are you so far detached from reality you can't even recognise what is rational? You belong in a Zoo with the other animals. They would bully and dominate you too on account of you being less than them intellectually like i'm doing.

If we don't even have fighters in some of those weight classes, then it can't be done. Just like it can't be done with you if you don't have fighters in those weight classes. But that isn't the point or any point you've made. It's your deflection and strawman after you couldn't back up your words when i questioned you on it. You just ran which is typical form you clowns.

You also don't understand irony either. If you did, you wouldn't have written the words " Brits always talk and never back it up". You've just proven those words. As do pretty much every American fighter throughout history just before they lose. In fact, it's a pretty common thing for fighters to say regardless of where they're from. Why, which fighters go into a fight claiming they're going to lose, little man? But one nation sticks out when it comes to this. I'll argue that point and dominate there too, but we need to go through points without you running like a coward with deflections and strawman arguments every time and losing like you have done with every single point you were ****** enough to claim.

But i'l,play your game anyway just for the sake of it...

Who beats Benevidez at 168? Smith (If he's the same after getting f3cked over against Canelo) and Saunders. Benevidez hasn't beaten anyone. He even had a close fight with a tomato can and got dropped by him. His name is Ronald Gavril.

Who beats the nobodies Andrade and Charlo? Saunders does. Saunders has proven something. Andrade hasn't even been in the ring with a world class fighter, let alone beating one. Charlo was beaten by a finished Korobov on a few days notice but Korobov was ripped off like so many overseas fighters in your corrupt asylum. Broner's opponent was the latest in a long line of robberies. Saunders is levels above the boxing ability of Korobov and is prime, so it's easy to see how the Southpaw would do against Charlo. The only opponent of note Charlo has beaten is J Rock. You know, the guy who was blown away by Rosario even though he was a cherry pick like all PBC fights are? But do tell me when the coward Charlo fights anyone at world level. Ducking for the rest of his life like a coward isn't going to prove anything. Turning down 7 Mill for the Andrade fight shows how shook this fraud is. Has he stopped contradicting himself on the Canelo fight yet though? "Canelo needs to come see me at 160. Alright, i'll fight him at 168" Haha. Coward can't make his mind up. But who can over there in the asylum?

We don't have anyone at 147. We did have in Brook and Khan, but they were ducked by every American out there. Remember the poll that Floyd did asking who they would like to see him fight? And they picked Khan by a large margin? But then Floyd fought an opponent Khan had already beaten in Maidana and said Khan still had Garcia problems, but did so without realising Maidana still had "Khan problems"? That lack of seal-awareness and cowardice is a b1tch, isn't it little man? Brook was forced to fight Golovkin because he was sick and tied of being ducked by American cowards. Spence only fought him when he was badly drained coming back down to Welter, coming from a bad injury and a stoppage loss, Spence still couldn't win a round on my card in the first half when Brook had energy until he ran out of steam due to the weight drop. Even the eye socket injury was caused by a clash of heads. Not a punch. Spence lost to the guy who Brook dominated when at his best in Porter, but he got ripped off like he did in the Thurman fight. Spence was supposed to dominate and destroy Porter, but what actually unfolded was Spence being exposed and showing he couldn't deal with Porter's pressure. You know, like you delude yourself Brits can't deal with? That's another point i'll get to little man when i'm finished with explaining what a fallacy and strawmen arguments are.

Being from Scotland makes you a Brit. You t3rd. Scotland is a part of Great Britain. I know your country is internationally renowned for being laughable when it comes to Geography, but please limit your ret3rdation when conversing with me little man who is getting his pants pulled down in every way with every step. I can't handle too much laughter. It's killing me little man.

We don't have anyone at 154. But Charlo has been beaten by both Martirosyan (A robbery) and the cherry pick in Harrison. 154 Charlo looks like a Octopus having a spasm when he fights. Haha. He also had a close fight against an unproven and finished Austin Trout.

We don't have anyone at 135. We have Campbell, but he's coming off two defeats back to back. We don't even know if he'll retire or not.

We only have Frampton at 130. he's fighting Herring next. Will he continue his career after that? I don't know, but the end is coming considering he's past his best now. But please do let me know if any of these guys can match his resume when it's all said and done with their careers.

If i include the rest of the world...

Canelo, Saunders and Callum beat Benevidez at 168.

Golovkin, Saunders beat Charlo and Andrade at 160. Even though golovkin is past his best. Eubank has a chance as both have proven nothing. Eubank was supposed to fight Charlo after the Korobov fight, but i knew it wasn't going to happen. PBC made him a promise, but didn't think he showed enough weakness in the Korobov fight to make them comfortable enough to take the fight.

At 154, Charlo is waiting to be taken like he has a couple of times now. Castano, Tszyu, Hurd are the fights to happen. But the division is slim with talent. Everybody loses after having a good win and keep on passing the title around like pass the parcel.

At 147 it's pretty much Americans there. Ugas beat Porter, and Porter beat both Thurman and Spence, but it needs to be seen if Ugas beats Crawford or Spence. Spence still doesn't have a good world class win against a fighter his size who is fresh. He had his chance in Porter, but lost. Garcia isn't world level any more as he hasn't legitimately beat anyone since Khan many years ago. Robberies and corruption does not count. If you can't beat world level fighters, it's because you're not world level. Crawford last beat a world level fighter nearly 6 years ago. That's how bad it is. That was Postal. The only other world level fighter he beat was a midget who he dwarfed in Gamboa. That's how shocking his resume is. Spence is ducking him, but Crawford is ducking Porter and Thurman. None of these guys have done anything at 147.

Lightweight doesn't really have anyone other than Loma and Americans. Lopez never beat him as i had it a draw. But you know what the corruption is like over there for overseas fighters. Those scorecards were disgusting as usual. Loma should have had a rematch clause being the A side. But you know what happens when dealing with Americans. They'll look to f3ck you over in every way they can. It's just your nature as the facts prove. Tank ducked Loma like a coward for years and does nothing but cherry pick like a typical American coward. Haney hasn't even beaten a decent fighter at fringe level, let alone beat an actual world level fighter. Let me know when your hype jobs actually do something other than fight garbage and stack the deck all the time.

Stevenson? Another American who hasn't done anything. Now you know why you're so insecure about putting up their resumes. They don't even have a f3cking resume to speak of. That's why you deflected after you said you could do with a good laugh. But as i said, you're not laughing now, are you little man?

When i call you pathetic, have no dignity, and claim you're getting dominated, i can support that with substance. You can't. You're just copying me. But use Google to see what the psychological issue is when you start mirror imaging me and saying back to me what i did to you. It shows who's the boss, and who the little man is on the end of the leash. But i do look forward to more deflections and strawman arguments. It's either that or running away. I told you they were your only options little man. Nothing has changed. Delusion can't help you.

See you soon, b1tch. But if you stop showing fear, i'll happily go over every point one at a time to prove you wrong. But you won't stop showing fear. I knew this from the start. But everything you wrote is there for all to see. The domination is clear.