Comments Thread For: Callum Smith Backs Canelo Big To Beat Saunders, Plant, Yildirim
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Question:
¿Did Canelo got paid off to lose against Mayweather?
Rethoric Question:
¿Wouldn't make more sense for these guys who supposedly got paid off to win their respective fights so they would earn much more at a rematch?
Like I've said, I'm not gonna disrespect someone on the forum but I think we need to be smart and analyze every possible case and argument.
Some of these paid off theories doesn't make any sense.Comment
-
That's weak new age mentality..this is boxing. You only as good as your last win and his resume us full of beating old timers who were on the way down. That's not earning ****. That's good planning.
Andrade is very slick and usually very defensively responsible..I think Benavidez has the power to hurt Canelo bad. He won't be walked down like 6'4 Callum was..lol. Letting that 5'9 kid push him back like that..absolutely absurd.
I'm not a guy who is gonna disrespect anyone on a forum, but gotta be more smart when making arguments.
Andrade being slick won't translate to 100% beating Canelo, it would help him but it wouldn't be anything new that Canelo has not seen.
Benavidez is a very strong guy and a guy with power, however I wouldn't rate him as a demolisher Beterbiev style, he could not stop Ronald Gavril.
Listen I'm all about this fights, I wanna see Canelo vs Any top guy and that includes Andrade and Bena, but don't come in here saying he's picked everyone because that's a disrespect to a great boxer's career.Comment
-
-
Canelo is beating the old, untested, no-name guys and claims he is the best? Who are these guys anyway? I don't really trust a fighter who has been tested positive for a banned-substance it certainly taints the sport!
He can't beat Floyd so what he does is follow his cherry-picking footsteps and what's even worse is Canelo is fighting no-name guys. At least Floyd chose to fight the greats toward the end of the primes but we can't say the same about Canelo. The guy is a real talent no doubt but his cherry-picking ways are disgusting!Last edited by thehotman; 02-07-2021, 08:23 PM.Comment
-
he has looked like a zombie in 2 straight fights. if thats just how he fights then he sucks mah balls but he seems to have no energy or reflexes or anything. do you think he was drinking spiked water like wilder?Comment
-
That's weak new age mentality..this is boxing. You only as good as your last win and his resume us full of beating old timers who were on the way down. That's not earning ****. That's good planning.
Andrade is very slick and usually very defensively responsible..I think Benavidez has the power to hurt Canelo bad. He won't be walked down like 6'4 Callum was..lol. Letting that 5'9 kid push him back like that..absolutely absurd.Comment
-
I'm not the guy who is gonna disrespect someone in the forum, but bro, you need to be more smart than that, don't just point out at assumptions.
Question:
¿Did Canelo got paid off to lose against Mayweather?
Rethoric Question:
¿Wouldn't make more sense for these guys who supposedly got paid off to win their respective fights so they would earn much more at a rematch?
Like I've said, I'm not gonna disrespect someone on the forum but I think we need to be smart and analyze every possible case and argument.
Some of these paid off theories doesn't make any sense.
But apart from that - it's not just about the losing fighter and how much more money they could have won by winning the first fight and getting a rematch. Why do you think casinos pay so much money to resident singers and to stage boxing matches? It's not to lose money overall is it? It's to bring in gamblers/visitors/tourists whose combined spend far outweighs the outgoing on a fight. This is why we get dodgy decisions in Las Vegas with Canelo and others before him. There are zero American casual fans who will make a Vegas trip to see Golovkin or Kovalev. Canelo is a money machine for Las Vegas. And Mayweather before him. Mayweather was never going to lose until the Pac fight got made.Comment
Comment