Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Callum Smith Backs Canelo Big To Beat Saunders, Plant, Yildirim

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
    Yawn another compubox scorer.

    Abel Sanchez had no issues with the scorecard and I have NEVER seen a boxer run from the ring CRYING when they felt they won...

    Coming forward picked off??? That's a first I heard it explained that way.

    I see u ignore DEFENSE, combos, and Body work.

    Hey troll how much you win on GGG??? I know you LOST! Everyone who bet GGG to win LOST. And that's why your p@ssy still sore 2-3 years later.
    combos? thats not fair to ggg. he's too slow to throw a combo cut him some slack

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by daggum View Post
      combos? thats not fair to ggg. he's too slow to throw a combo cut him some slack
      This is Tru! My bad.

      To bad GGG isn't 7-8 years younger.

      That would of been one heck of a fight.

      I can't blame either one because neither was in their prime while the other one was.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by SteveM View Post
        This.

        Also after the Kovalev fight many noted the same with Kovalev, that he didn't put any power into the right hands he connected with. Were these guys paid off?

        Meanwhile, with Golovkin 2 hard fights - maybe GGG couldn't be paid off?
        I'm not the guy who is gonna disrespect someone in the forum, but bro, you need to be more smart than that, don't just point out at assumptions.

        Question:

        ¿Did Canelo got paid off to lose against Mayweather?

        Rethoric Question:
        ¿Wouldn't make more sense for these guys who supposedly got paid off to win their respective fights so they would earn much more at a rematch?

        Like I've said, I'm not gonna disrespect someone on the forum but I think we need to be smart and analyze every possible case and argument.

        Some of these paid off theories doesn't make any sense.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by HouseofM View Post
          That's weak new age mentality..this is boxing. You only as good as your last win and his resume us full of beating old timers who were on the way down. That's not earning ****. That's good planning.

          Andrade is very slick and usually very defensively responsible..I think Benavidez has the power to hurt Canelo bad. He won't be walked down like 6'4 Callum was..lol. Letting that 5'9 kid push him back like that..absolutely absurd.
          Myke Tyson was a 5'10 guy demolishing 6'2+ guys.

          I'm not a guy who is gonna disrespect anyone on a forum, but gotta be more smart when making arguments.

          Andrade being slick won't translate to 100% beating Canelo, it would help him but it wouldn't be anything new that Canelo has not seen.

          Benavidez is a very strong guy and a guy with power, however I wouldn't rate him as a demolisher Beterbiev style, he could not stop Ronald Gavril.

          Listen I'm all about this fights, I wanna see Canelo vs Any top guy and that includes Andrade and Bena, but don't come in here saying he's picked everyone because that's a disrespect to a great boxer's career.

          Comment


          • #45
            Well nel o is pfp no1 or 2 so of course he's favourite. But bigger upsetshave happened

            Comment


            • #46
              Funny how some Canelo haters make excuses for Smith´s loss when Smith himself doesn´t.

              Comment


              • #47
                Canelo is beating the old, untested, no-name guys and claims he is the best? Who are these guys anyway? I don't really trust a fighter who has been tested positive for a banned-substance it certainly taints the sport!

                He can't beat Floyd so what he does is follow his cherry-picking footsteps and what's even worse is Canelo is fighting no-name guys. At least Floyd chose to fight the greats toward the end of the primes but we can't say the same about Canelo. The guy is a real talent no doubt but his cherry-picking ways are disgusting!
                Last edited by thehotman; 02-07-2021, 08:23 PM.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by budfr View Post
                  Funny how some Canelo haters make excuses for Smith´s loss when Smith himself doesn´t.
                  he has looked like a zombie in 2 straight fights. if thats just how he fights then he sucks mah balls but he seems to have no energy or reflexes or anything. do you think he was drinking spiked water like wilder?

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by HouseofM View Post
                    That's weak new age mentality..this is boxing. You only as good as your last win and his resume us full of beating old timers who were on the way down. That's not earning ****. That's good planning.

                    Andrade is very slick and usually very defensively responsible..I think Benavidez has the power to hurt Canelo bad. He won't be walked down like 6'4 Callum was..lol. Letting that 5'9 kid push him back like that..absolutely absurd.
                    canelo is not even 5'9. he was slightly taller than floyd and floyd is 5'7 at most, prob shorter since he barely edged hatton when they were wearing socks and hatton himself said hes 5'6 and celebheieghts confirmed that when they met him. canelo obv uses his small stature, low center of gravity, and barrels of roids to dominate bigger taller foes. callum smith is just a big walking stiff who can barely throw a punch he drained himself so much

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by batista84 View Post
                      I'm not the guy who is gonna disrespect someone in the forum, but bro, you need to be more smart than that, don't just point out at assumptions.

                      Question:

                      ¿Did Canelo got paid off to lose against Mayweather?

                      Rethoric Question:
                      ¿Wouldn't make more sense for these guys who supposedly got paid off to win their respective fights so they would earn much more at a rematch?

                      Like I've said, I'm not gonna disrespect someone on the forum but I think we need to be smart and analyze every possible case and argument.

                      Some of these paid off theories doesn't make any sense.
                      I was fishing for a bite. And you bit!

                      But apart from that - it's not just about the losing fighter and how much more money they could have won by winning the first fight and getting a rematch. Why do you think casinos pay so much money to resident singers and to stage boxing matches? It's not to lose money overall is it? It's to bring in gamblers/visitors/tourists whose combined spend far outweighs the outgoing on a fight. This is why we get dodgy decisions in Las Vegas with Canelo and others before him. There are zero American casual fans who will make a Vegas trip to see Golovkin or Kovalev. Canelo is a money machine for Las Vegas. And Mayweather before him. Mayweather was never going to lose until the Pac fight got made.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP