Can any active fighter end up being the GOAT?
Collapse
-
-
It's going to be hard because people always put the older generations up on a pedestal. Example is they will give current champ like Joshua **** for a mandatory vs Pulev yet they will never talk about Ali's many title defences vs guys Pulev would murder.
Theres a huge double standard, someone would have to have basically a perfect career to be considered.Comment
-
Lets play devils advocate and remove our bias here.
The greatest have all lost. Hell, some people may find greatness in that loss since he dared that young and even though it didnt go his way, he only became more impressive after and it did not damage his psyche. He was also exonerated by the same people he “failed” the test from but people only like accepting the part of the story that they like. If we accept the failure by them, we should also accept the exoneration. And almost every great fighter has needed those close fights against men as good as them.
I think he has the best chance right now and the opposition in range. We’re just hating if we can’t admit that if he becomes undisputed and fights some of these guys and wins that we have to start talking about it. He’s already reaching really rare heights.
Pacquiao has a decent chance because he has Bud and Spence in range. It would be nothing short of absolutely insane if he pulled that off. It seems way too unlikely though but it’s possibleComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Yeah, no. Nobody aside from Klitschko who was old comes close to anyones resume from the 90s let alone Ali's. Idk wtf your smoking but lay off it. Furys resume is trash. Idk why thats hard for you to accept. Not his fault the division itself sucksComment
-
No.
Now thats not to say one shouldnt, but unlike other sports so much of boxing is anecdotal (as opposed to stats that support an individual's accomplishments). So no matter how much a guy wins or how good a fighter is, the curmudgeon get off my lawn crowd can always claim fighters were tougher back in the day, when society was more difficult and made men tougher. And thus the greats of yesteryear will always be better, and thus the GOATs
Add in the fact that fighters like Greb, SRR, Armstrong, Langford fought far more often, allowing for more impressive resumes- and you see why the GOAT in boxing is firmly entrenched. Though someone may come along greater, they wont get the full recognition as suchComment
-
Agreed. This is exactly what I was getting at when I made this thread. Well said.No.
Now thats not to say one shouldnt, but unlike other sports so much of boxing is anecdotal (as opposed to stats that support an individual's accomplishments). So no matter how much a guy wins or how good a fighter is, the curmudgeon get off my lawn crowd can always claim fighters were tougher back in the day, when society was more difficult and made men tougher. And thus the greats of yesteryear will always be better, and thus the GOATs
Add in the fact that fighters like Greb, SRR, Armstrong, Langford fought far more often, allowing for more impressive resumes- and you see why the GOAT in boxing is firmly entrenched. Though someone may come along greater, they wont get the full recognition as suchComment
Comment