Defences are obviously important, that’s why we rate guys like Louis so highly cause he consistently beat top 10 guys.
One reason I consider winning the Ring title twice impressive though is it means you beat the #1 in the division twice, or were the #1 and beat the #2 in the division twice. Defences generally won’t come against the #2 guy, in the modern era they regularly don’t even come against a top 15 guy.
I do agree Fury needs to add at least a few defences to his resume before he retires though if he wants to be compared to the greats historically.
Defences are about context I think. For example Wladimir defended the ring belt against absolute scrubs like Leapai, an old Mormeck, Pianeta, Wach etc. On paper they count the same as Ali’s defences against Patterson, Norton, Frazier etc.
In the modern era I feel defences have lost prestige as they can be a against some real sh**ty fighters. As we were saying the other day, look at some of the mandatories Wlad had during his reign, just complete trash.
One reason I consider winning the Ring title twice impressive though is it means you beat the #1 in the division twice, or were the #1 and beat the #2 in the division twice. Defences generally won’t come against the #2 guy, in the modern era they regularly don’t even come against a top 15 guy.
I do agree Fury needs to add at least a few defences to his resume before he retires though if he wants to be compared to the greats historically.
Defences are about context I think. For example Wladimir defended the ring belt against absolute scrubs like Leapai, an old Mormeck, Pianeta, Wach etc. On paper they count the same as Ali’s defences against Patterson, Norton, Frazier etc.
In the modern era I feel defences have lost prestige as they can be a against some real sh**ty fighters. As we were saying the other day, look at some of the mandatories Wlad had during his reign, just complete trash.

Comment