Why does Canelo have a mandatory if he's franchise champion?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
It's ridiculous..........I'm on my phone right now and it's **** for doing searches, but I'm near as dammit 100% sure that the language attached to the franchise title meant that he was considered a WBC champion representing them in whichever division he fought in.
That said it also wasn't supposed to be transferable in the ring, but they changes that rule quick sharp to give Teo a shot at it.
Guess is that Maurice is just making it up as he goes along... Possibly he wanted to pre-emptively deflect any criticism that might come Canelos way by giving him the ol' mandatory excuse. Certainly wouldn't put it past him.
Hmm. Maybe the idea goes that the franchise **** ain't attached to a weight class but that it can be a designation that can run concurrent with other titles? So he is both franchise Champion at any weight he competes at and simultaneously 168 Champ with whatever obligations go with that title?
Comment
-
Comment
-
More BS from that crook Sulaiman, Franchise is not a belt but a designation which means Canelo actually still is a franchise champion and shouldn’t have to fight Yildrim!
Hearn can get Canelo this bs fight but refuses to make Golovkin vs Andrade or Saunders vs AndradeComment
-
...because he was the WBC MIDDLEWEIGHT champion. The designation is to not have mandatories while youre jumping around in weight. Aka he doesnt have to worry about mandatories at 160. Not that he doesnt have to ever in diff divisions
Yldrim was a mandatory to the full wbc before canelo ever held the 168 title, which is what theyre fighting over.
It’d be pretty bull s hit for any division that Teo and Canelo were in if mandatories didnt exist and everyone who was in line just has to go f uck themselves lmaoComment
Comment