He isn't but he's a solid gatekeeper type who has been quite unfortunate. Its easy to glance over his record & scoff but he arguably beat Solomon, Kavaliauskas & Kelly.
With his pedigree I think Ennis should have been fighting guys like this half a dozen or so fights back. As someone mentioned Vergil Ortiz who is even younger than Ennis & had around half as many pro fights yet he is fighting better quality opposition.
I believe in Ennis, a lot do but I have to question whether his handlers do. I am starting to question what the hold up is, he's approaching nearly 30 pro fights & only just stepped up slightly to fight a faded, largely inactive Chris Van Heerdan who wasn't any good in the first place. An opponent whom a 18 fight novice in Spence beat to a pulp back when he wasn't a faded, part time boxer if you will
Comment