Let’s start with dumping all these ridiculous belts abs go back to one champ a division abs then let’s educated the Johnny come lately casual fans in the reality that champions defend their belts against contenders. Sick and tired of all these just became boxing fans who want to see super fights every time out
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: Mandatories For Unified Champs Are Problematic, We Need To Find Solution
Collapse
-
Joshua v. Pulev was originally scheduled for spring 2020 right? So without the Covid delay the WBO would've been called when? December?
If each sanctioning body goes in order a fighter should be able to fight 1 mandatory and 1 voluntary a year. Simple solution
Comment
-
I think I'm right in saying Povetkin was also number 1 for the WBO when AJ fought him but they declined to have him satisfy two mandatorys with one fight.
1) No more silly belts as if you are the WBC B champ you can't get a ranking in the others as you're a champion so that has to go.
2) If someone is rank 1 in more than one org count you can do multiple defences in one fight.
3) Ditch the silly rankings with promoter bias how was Dubouis #2 with the WBO. Wilders run of defences against Haymon/King fighters was ridiculous. etc etc
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by nghtmr111 View PostI have a great idea... make another belt!
Introducing the WBC ‘Roadblock Reform’ belt.
‘The WBC I’m the mandatory but the champ is unified, waiting in the queue, let’s not lose sanctioning fee championship of the world!’
Comment
Comment