I personally think 2 unification can be fun but 4 is way to much your thoughts?
How many belts do you think boxing should have?
Collapse
-
Two Period.
One for the Bigguns
One for the Normies
None for the Bobbleheads
In all seriousness, I'm fine with just the WBA/C or IBF/WBOComment
-
One is the obvious answer, but anything less than what he have now is what we can hope for and that's still a long shot.
We're more likely to see even more titles than less.Comment
-
They should be more like kickboxing and have 50-100 belts were weight class
It would be far more lucrative. In the long run.Comment
-
I'm fine with 4 just don't want the extras Super etc. Also would like if organizations would work together to do more Unifications . In a perfect world I'd say just 1 title and 1 intern title but whichever promoter is in control of the title would keep the fights in house . Unless organizations can Mandate better fights more oftenComment
-
1 belt per division with ibf's rules. 1 belt with wbc/wba idiotic behaviour would be useless. every mandatory fight and eliminator would essentially be what unifications are now. we would get unification quality fights every year in every division (at least two of them). interim title is fine when a champion can't defend for at least a year. any other change wouldn't satisfy me.Comment
-
Comment
Comment