How many belts do you think boxing should have?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Blue54
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2017
    • 1220
    • 61
    • 8
    • 65,942

    #1

    How many belts do you think boxing should have?

    I personally think 2 unification can be fun but 4 is way to much your thoughts?
  • _Rexy_
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2018
    • 27929
    • 6,140
    • 3,585
    • 358,040

    #2
    At least ten. Top 10 in every division should have a belt, and they should never fight each other.

    Comment

    • Marchegiano
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2010
      • 12208
      • 1,790
      • 2,307
      • 165,288

      #3
      Two Period.

      One for the Bigguns

      One for the Normies

      None for the Bobbleheads

      In all seriousness, I'm fine with just the WBA/C or IBF/WBO

      Comment

      • Willy Wanker
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Aug 2010
        • 19923
        • 4,776
        • 5,008
        • 220,625

        #4
        One is the obvious answer, but anything less than what he have now is what we can hope for and that's still a long shot.

        We're more likely to see even more titles than less.

        Comment

        • Blue54
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2017
          • 1220
          • 61
          • 8
          • 65,942

          #5
          Originally posted by _Rexy_
          At least ten. Top 10 in every division should have a belt, and they should never fight each other.
          Lol sounds legit.

          Comment

          • Rick Taylor
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2020
            • 2249
            • 49
            • 40
            • 49,669

            #6
            Originally posted by Blue54
            I personally think 2 unification can be fun but 4 is way to much your thoughts?
            Originally posted by _Rexy_
            At least ten. Top 10 in every division should have a belt, and they should never fight each other.
            Originally posted by Marchegiano
            Two Period.

            One for the Bigguns

            One for the Normies

            None for the Bobbleheads

            In all seriousness, I'm fine with just the WBA/C or IBF/WBO
            Originally posted by Willy Wanker
            One is the obvious answer, but anything less than what he have now is what we can hope for and that's still a long shot.

            We're more likely to see even more titles than less.

            They should be more like kickboxing and have 50-100 belts were weight class

            It would be far more lucrative. In the long run.

            Comment

            • Ricardi
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2019
              • 1730
              • 591
              • 364
              • 8,172

              #7
              I'm fine with 4 just don't want the extras Super etc. Also would like if organizations would work together to do more Unifications . In a perfect world I'd say just 1 title and 1 intern title but whichever promoter is in control of the title would keep the fights in house . Unless organizations can Mandate better fights more often

              Comment

              • Nicamex
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • May 2013
                • 209
                • 6
                • 9
                • 14,556

                #8
                1 belt with no catch weights with a belt on the line

                Comment

                • drablj
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 781
                  • 285
                  • 646
                  • 17,293

                  #9
                  1 belt per division with ibf's rules. 1 belt with wbc/wba idiotic behaviour would be useless. every mandatory fight and eliminator would essentially be what unifications are now. we would get unification quality fights every year in every division (at least two of them). interim title is fine when a champion can't defend for at least a year. any other change wouldn't satisfy me.

                  Comment

                  • GGG Gloveking
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Apr 2016
                    • 12382
                    • 658
                    • 193
                    • 189,439

                    #10
                    Originally posted by _Rexy_
                    At least ten. Top 10 in every division should have a belt, and they should never fight each other.
                    I agree. It should be like karate class, where everybody gets a belt based on ranking.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP