Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should the Klitschko Brothers had been forced to fight each other?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by PugilistTom View Post
    Yes we all know they are brothers, but both of their careers were in boxing.

    Everyone understands the dangers on the sport, yet it is a decision they both decided to enter.

    So with that being said, how come we didn't get that fight?

    Both are fighters. Fighters FIGHT.
    - -U feel special sissy today?

    Comment


    • #12
      Absolutely not. Brothers should never be forced to fight each other. They fought all challengers. In the entire history of boxing there have been lots of brothers that held titles in the same weight class. Not long ago the Charlo brothers both had a world title at 154. Brothers have never been ordered to fight each other in the long history of boxing because it is unnatural and unreasonable. So why should the K brothers have been ordered to fight each other when no other pair of brothers ever got such an order under any circumstances?

      Comment


      • #13
        They should have been forced to fight to the death. That should be the stipulation for all matches, to be honest. It will clear up that A-side B-side nonsense real quick.

        Comment


        • #14
          No it would be unethical

          Brothers shouldn't fight each other, that's why joshua and wilder never fought

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by PugilistTom View Post
            Yes we all know they are brothers, but both of their careers were in boxing.

            Everyone understands the dangers on the sport, yet it is a decision they both decided to enter.

            So with that being said, how come we didn't get that fight?

            Both are fighters. Fighters FIGHT.
            Just wouldn't work, man.... seriously how you gonna force guys to fight each other ffs? And even if you did lever them with say belts or finacial penalties how the hell you gonna make 'em give it their all rather than just agreeing on a winner before had and doing their best to makle it look good?

            Comment


            • #16
              It would be a dumb idea to sanction that fight.

              What if they fix it?

              Comment


              • #17
                Maybe it would have been one of the all time best pound for pound matches but then again two pound coins in a ring probably win that one!

                Comment


                • #18
                  Casuals, your boy Spence doesn`t even want to fight Charlos, because they are friends, lol.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Hustle View Post
                    What special rules? You sound ******.

                    No boxers can be forced to fight. If that was the case.

                    Charlo vs Canelo
                    Spence vs Bud
                    Plant vs Benividez
                    Wilder vs joshua

                    Would all have happened a long time ago.

                    But brothers should be forced? Man please
                    Dude I could not give any less ****s about your inability to interpret what I said. Have a good one.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Was there ever a position when one would have been mandatory to the other?

                      I'm assuming that the rules would have still applied. ie not taking the fight would have resulted in one of them being stripped of their position.

                      But how else are you forcing two guys to fight? You can't. And I respect that they wouldn't have fought.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP