Whooping on Callum Smith should silence all haters! Just look at Canelo's last 5 five opponents, and Crawford's last 5 opponents! Canelo has beaten Top 5 opponents at 154, 160, and 168! That's P4P #1 without question!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Canelo On Being No. 1 P4P: Will Always Be People That Don't Like You, No Matter What
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostWhooping on Callum Smith should silence all haters! Just look at Canelo's last 5 five opponents, and Crawford's last 5 opponents! Canelo has beaten Top 5 opponents at 154, 160, and 168! That's P4P #1 without question!
Comment
-
Originally posted by a5pe4 View PostNot to mention 175. People need to realize that even if Crawford was P4P better, he has to prove his worth against some credible opponents. Unfortunately at this time, they all are across the street with PBC
Comment
-
I love coming to these boards and reading the celebutard fame chaser comments. It’s absolutely hilarious to read the mentally stunted come here and rage against someone whom they’ve never met yet comment as the boxing casuals they are. It’s beautiful they’ve become fans of the sport within the last few years however it’s pure comedy gold to see them spittle over a boxer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostWhooping on Callum Smith should silence all haters! Just look at Canelo's last 5 five opponents, and Crawford's last 5 opponents! Canelo has beaten Top 5 opponents at 154, 160, and 168! That's P4P #1 without question!
Crawford COULD be up there in future but he's done little up to this point
Canelo easily up the top.
Comment
-
Thing about canelo is that he’s a smart guy he doesn’t need a fake gimmick or 100 people around him he stays grounded and focus on the task at hand always.
Comment
-
Nice little slip ins by the author to remind everyone of his positive ped test in case y’all forgot and to also mention how Alvarez hasn’t “officially” lost since mayweather, since most know there’s anywhere from 1-3 other losses that really could/should be on there.
Comment
Comment