3G lost, Fury drew, May is unbeaten, stop crying

[Dariusz]

there are times... when a judge can get it wrong

Yes.

most times the officials get it right, and the fans get it wrong

Yes.

punch-stats are nearly impossible to record accurately, and often they are not relevant to how a fight unfolds... which is why they are not official scoring criteria... a robot would need to work out why certain things are happening and calculate for effective aggression, ring generalship, and defence... it would need to accommodate all styles and cannot be relied upon to adjudicate rare/difficult/new situations that will occur

A highly sophisticated software would do the job easily. Human minds are not only erratic per se but also subjective to their own preferences and even corruption.

The number of wrongly judged fights is not big, however, not as small as you said. E.g. apart from evident robberies (that happens very rarely, as you said) how many times one judge gave an idiotic verdict comparing to two others ? It's enough to imagine the reverse situation, two verdicts are idiotic and only one is just.

Automation comes to every aspect of our lives for our own good; I do not know any reason it should not go into sports.

P.S. A good example is ski jumping. Since there is a factor of chnging weather on a seconds basis they worked out a software that counts points in plus for a bad ones and in minus for a good ones for a jumper. OTOH, they still keep these five idiots that add subjectively points for styles...hope it will vanish soon or be also replaced by a robot.

[QueensburyRules]

I mean seriously. Y'all think real ****ing highly of your own opinions don't you?

Every thread multiple mugs have to pretend like official reasoning has considered their opinion.

No one at the IBHOF gives a **** what you think bud.

No one at Boxrec over rules an outcome because you feel strongly.

None of the bodies disregard their own ****ing rulings, ya moron.

Ring/TBRB do not rank based on your thoughts


Pac lost to Bradley, and Horn. stop crying

3G never beat Canelo, not once, not twice, never. you're a *****

Tyson Fury got a draw and he's lucky to have, ffs.

Wlad was not even ****ing close to winning against Fury. Really, not even close.

Wilder's been fighting top tens for a long time now.

Bermane, Charles, and Joe are former champions

Floyd has zero losses

your scorecard is the most pointless **** we ever talk about on here.

so on. this could go forever.

It's fine in threads like "your top ten" but in threads like "Who should X fight next" don't tell me some bull**** about some ending that didn't happen. It's not just a waste of time, it's annoying baby bull**** brought to you by grown ass men.

- -How much U asinine been growing these days?

[Roadblock]

I guess. Then that means all of our opinions about anything are pointless if we're not in the boxing industry or making money off boxing.

I think if a poster knows boxing it will come through what they say, its dead easy to know when youre talking to a casual fan that has a couple of favorites and bags everyone else, there is so much BS in here said by people where you instantly know the guy knows fck all.

[aboutfkntime]

Yes.




Yes.



A highly sophisticated software would do the job easily. Human minds are not only erratic per se but also subjective to their own preferences and even corruption.

The number of wrongly judged fights is not big, however, not as small as you said. E.g. apart from evident robberies (that happens very rarely, as you said) how many times one judge gave an idiotic verdict comparing to two others ? It's enough to imagine the reverse situation, two verdicts are idiotic and only one is just.

Automation comes to every aspect of our lives for our own good; I do not know any reason it should not go into sports.

P.S. A good example is ski jumping. Since there is a factor of chnging weather on a seconds basis they worked out a software that counts points in plus for a bad ones and in minus for a good ones for a jumper. OTOH, they still keep these five idiots that add subjectively points for styles...hope it will vanish soon or be also replaced by a robot.

I just disagree on that one

I think it would be extremely difficult to program a computer to read how a fight unfolds... then folds back up, then unfolds again... that would take years of testing and development, and would be very costly to implement

don't think it will ever happen

fans will still disagree with results, leading them to scream that the computers are rigged