Do you stream fights? Do you pay someone for it? That may end soon

[KTFOKING]

Seems like this is for the people that stream for the public, not those that watch streams.

[Bandman]

nonsense. nothing will stop illegal streams.

[YoungManRumble]

No they are gonna pop everyone in one full swoop. My cousin runs CIA. They are gonna shake up sports with this. Wait and see. A lot of lost revenue over illegal streams.

Lol it would be the FBI... Not that your cousin runs anything apart from the local corner store.

[FinitoxDinamita]

😂 good luck

[FinitoxDinamita]

I pay $8 a month and get 4000 plus channels from all over the world, nfl, nba, mlb season pass, every premium movie channel in 7 languages and every ppv event plus boxnation. I’ll take that over any deal anywhere else. Iptv is where it’s at. These guys also operate out of countries that don’t listen to dmca claims. ISP blocks them, use a vpn.

Definitely the future. Lmfao at dudes paying for DAzN, PPVs, and cables.

[Armchairhero]

I pay $8 a month and get 4000 plus channels from all over the world, nfl, nba, mlb season pass, every premium movie channel in 7 languages and every ppv event plus boxnation. I’ll take that over any deal anywhere else. Iptv is where it’s at. These guys also operate out of countries that don’t listen to dmca claims. ISP blocks them, use a vpn.

Yeh it’s the way, it might go down after a few month or it might last a full year, if it lasts a month or more it’s already paid for it’s self

[Toffee]

nonsense. nothing will stop illegal streams.

The music industry pretty much did it. Not by clamping down on piracy, but by acknowledging changing consumer habits and responding with something that appealed to the changing market.

DAZN etc are Spotify etc.

If it's easy to get and reasonably priced I'll pay for it. If it's a ****ty, inconvenient and overpriced service then I'll take my chance on streams.

[Sweet Scions]

Many of the free streams are hosted overseas. Russian stream broadcaster won’t give a crap

Remember when it was illegal to download music without paying and countless people still did it anyways

This precisely, which is what allows them to circumvent these laws to begin with. I see this as mostly another attempt to dissuade those uneducated on the matter through fear, much like p2p scare tactics, that will effectively change very little in terms of actual availability

[Combat Talk Radio]

I can't see anybody getting "caught" doing that....nice public service announcement though

Many of the free streams are hosted overseas. Russian stream broadcaster won’t give a crap

Remember when it was illegal to download music without paying and countless people still did it anyways

Back during MayPac (which had a LOT of illegal streaming) quite a few sites got shut down. Many of them were overseas.

What happens is, the US has an agreement with certain countries to enforce piracy regardless. That's what they tried to use to get Kim DotCom out in New Zealand, to the point of his place being raided and him being locked up for a while.

People don't realize that just because a service is overseas doesn't mean the US has no jurisdiction. If you don't use a VPN, you are vulnerable - even then some VPN services have agreements to share data buried in their TOS (TunnelBear is one I know of for sure) when subpoena'd. From there it's just following a money trail.

10 $ a month? Really? Just pay for the legit dazn subscription if your gonna do that ffs! 😂

DAZN has approximately 8% of boxing available. No Showtime stuff, only certain HBO stuff, none of the ams, only certain tourneys, etc.

I pay $8 a month and get 4000 plus channels from all over the world, nfl, nba, mlb season pass, every premium movie channel in 7 languages and every ppv event plus boxnation. I’ll take that over any deal anywhere else. Iptv is where it’s at. These guys also operate out of countries that don’t listen to dmca claims. ISP blocks them, use a vpn.

As long as it's a VPN that doesn't have in its TOS that it can share identify if asked. But as noted below, this new law targets the people doing the sharing, NOT the consumer anyway.

Seems like this is for the people that stream for the public, not those that watch streams.

Correct. It was purposely written to go after the ones sharing the stream, not the consumers.

The reason is, it's whack-a-mole to try and go after consumers. One site might stream to hundreds of thousands of people; that's easier to target and take out than trying to get all hundreds of thousands of people streaming. Plus most people streaming (NSB especially) are broke, so you can't really take anything, and no judge will lock up some boxing fan that was too broke to pay to watch Crawford fight.