Hopkins vs GGG at 160
Collapse
-
-
Which top 12 contenders, in which he loses 8 are you speaking of?Comment
-
I would say Jacobs is on par with Taylor, not just skill wise but also size and athleticism.
And Hopkins was 0-2 v Taylor so it wouldn’t be actually out of the realms of reality now would it🤔Comment
-
it is ridiculously off-topic, considering the question is Golovkin vs Hopkins
Golovkin is basic, no frills... just heavy-handed, and reasonably technically correct... his ringIQ/defence are not first-class... just like Kelly Pavlik
Hopkins was highly skilled, with a deep bag of tricks and a crazy ringIQ... he made an art-form out of exposing opponents that were favored to beat him... just like Kelly Pavlik
and you are sleeping on Allen who was skilled with a good amateur pedigree... just because you never heard of him before you checked boxrec does not mean he was a scrub
Danny Jacobs was widely regarded as a hypejob who had been exposed by Pirog, before he became a star by losing to Golovkin lolComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Calling it a truck load of garbage is easier than putting in the effort to justify your claim I guess.
If I say a fighter has exceptional speed or an exceptional chin, is that the same as saying they’re an exceptional fighter? No...lol. Stop clinging to that and explain why you believe the guy was “outstanding”...otherwise stfu and move on.
A 55 yr old “man” going in circles trying to play gotcha instead of taking a couple minutes to articulate his point...smh.Comment


Comment