I think Wilder has a better resume. He was the WBC world champion for a long time. He has only 1 loss and a truckload of KO wins. Pulev has two losses and has never been a champion and has a low percentage of KO wins. no ranking place has him ranked higher than Wilder. Every place ranks Wilder much higher.
I can't help but wonder how the **** someone suggests Tony Thompson and Dereck Chisora are resume names but Samuel Peter isn't. Two guys, who firstly probably have losses to Wilder's leftovers anyway, I did not check, but definitely were not ever anything but contenders, have no resume to speak of, and were well past their best by the time they fought Pulev. How is it they get mention along greats wins or losses to great champions such as Ust who was unbeaten, prime, and a top contender when they fought, Wlad who was the long time reigning champion either coming in on or surpassing Louis at the time when he fought Pulev, and Joshua who is the 3 belt x2 champion going into the Pulev fight, but, Sam Peter, was is just as past it as Tony or Dereck, but has a tiny bit of resume in Tony and Maskaev, and was a former champion when Pulev fought him.
Thompson and Chisora have no wins, no awards, and were old
Peter has wins, awards, and was old. How the **** does Peter get no love?
Only answer is Sam Peter isn't a name this green as a baby turd child knows.
Comment