Fury v AJ is a mismatch

[Jdasilva2012]

unless something unpredictable happens, Fury'd win easy. You don't need to be an expert to know that. In boxing like in many other disciplines, there are levels...Fury is several levels above.

[REDEEMER]

You’re not excited because once Fury loses to A.J most on here are done because they then have to talk about other skilled boxers .

The second wave of fighters will be even better who come at A.J ......Joyce, Hrgovic, Usyk, Sirenko , Yoka , Mahkmudov etc...

I bet Fury doesn’t fight any of these guy ? I’d even settle for Wallin rematch.

[The Ox]

You’re not excited because once Fury loses to A.J most on here are done because they then have to talk about other skilled boxers .

The second wave of fighters will be even better who come at A.J ......Joyce, Hrgovic, Usyk, Sirenko , Yoka , Mahkmudov etc...

I bet Fury doesn’t fight any of these guy ? I’d even settle for Wallin rematch.

All those fighters are garbage, inlcuding AJ

[Bain01D]

I’d love to see how Joshua is going to land combinations on Fury when Joshua barely even throw single shots without setting his feet and setting himself.

Do you think Fury has the best distance control in the division and longest reach is going to stand there and let Joshua unload combinations?

Jesus, the lack of boxing knowledge from most people on here is astounding

So you would rate McDermott above AJ? Because he managed to beat Fury!?

Regardless of ‘boxing knowledge’ no one knows how it goes.

On paper Fury has the edge ans should win, but AJ has a real chance.

[Bain01D]

All those fighters are garbage, inlcuding AJ

How can you say they are garbage? Yoka is widely regarded and the best prospect in world boxing?

You might say they are overrated but you can say they are garbage!

[deathofaclown]

So you would rate McDermott above AJ? Because he managed to beat Fury!?

Regardless of ‘boxing knowledge’ no one knows how it goes.

On paper Fury has the edge ans should win, but AJ has a real chance.

I don’t go on performances based on when fighters were basically at the start of their career. Some great fighters had bad losses and close fights.

I’m talking about boxing ability in the here and now. I’m just don’t see any trouble for a fury in this fight. I’ve explained why in more depth in plenty of posts in the past and last night never changed that.

[SweetPbfAli]

Has Fury had a successful title defense?

[Bain01D]

I don’t go on performances based on when fighters were basically at the start of their career. Some great fighters had bad losses and close fights.

I’m talking about boxing ability in the here and now. I’m just don’t see any trouble for a fury in this fight. I’ve explained why in more depth in plenty of posts in the past and last night never changed that.

For me it’s about the certainty and conviction of your claims.

I agree Fury SHOULD win, but he’s not fighting some journeyman where it’s a 1/100,000 chance. There is a real risk Fury could be beaten.

So yes it’s likely but you can’t talk down about people who believe AJ has a chance because he does

[REDEEMER]

All those fighters are garbage, inlcuding AJ

You guys will disappear when or if Fury finds his pen . Second worst fan base only to Wilders .

[REDEEMER]

Has Fury had a successful title defense?

No and that’s the irony of it all. Even the forum was giving him title defenses based on lineal ? What ? Ha