How come there are so many posters here making excuses for lomachenko's loss?

[BillyBoxing]

Fair enough Teo needs to prove more too I agree with you. The real fight at 135 is Teo vs Haney whoever wins will get credit for being the best.

Hell yeah, Haney vs Teo being made would be a nice Christmas gift for boxing fans.

Saying that Loma is all hype was not fair bruh, people on this forum need to stop overusing this word.

Loma received a lot of negativity for losing a fight to Teo, we should praise him for taking those kind of fights when most fighter of this generation play it soft and only cherry pick when moving up.

As Breadman in his dailybag pointed, Loma in 16 fights is 15 title fights and 13-2, that is true and mind blowing, he has beaten 9 world champions, he lost twice, but losing happens when you truly challenge yourself and go out of your confort zone.

[BillyBoxing]

the difference is loma was a 3 belt champ at 135, rigo had not even fought at 130 prior to their fight

Agreed, Loma had some time to "acclimatize" to 135.

That's maybe why Loma didn't get wiped out like Rigo.

But I notice that Loma just was way too much with Rigo and competitive with Teo. That's how good dude is.