How come the people arguing just can't say that he lost fair and square?
How come there are so many posters here making excuses for lomachenko's loss?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
So since Lomo is only good at 126, he
is 2 divisions smaller than Teofimo so I guess it works both ways huh?
When Loma beat Rigo it's because Rigo is TOO small and old, when Loma loses to a bigger younger guy, it's because Loma sucks...DOUBLE STANDARDSComment
-
-
Fair enough Teo needs to prove more too I agree with you. The real fight at 135 is Teo vs Haney whoever wins will get credit for being the best.Comment
-
I think most of the Loma fans (as I am) admitted Teo won.
Teo won fair and square you could score this fight 6-6 to 9-3 Teo.
The most reasonable cards probably was 7-5 Teo IMO
That being said, good fight for Loma, no shame in losing a 5-7 type of decision versus a younger bigger fighter who in my opinion/eye test is a A/elite fighter (still has to prove it).
People trying to argue about a Loma win are unsecure delusionnal people. Admiring a fighter's boxing skills and being a grupie are 2 different things.Comment
-
the difference is loma was a 3 belt champ at 135, rigo had not even fought at 130 prior to their fightComment
Comment