Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Spence: Brook Definitely Is Damaged Goods; Crawford Did What He Was Supposed To Do

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I mean he’s not wrong lmao. Atleast you had the Jeff lacy comparisons when Spence fought brook. We all knew this was gonna be light work for bud. I still liked the fight regardless.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Mister Wolf View Post
      He can talk all he want. If Porter refuses to exercise his right as the WBO mandatory and fight Crawford NEXT then we all will know he doesn't think he can beat Crawford.
      Originally posted by Mister Wolf View Post
      That doesn't change what I said. Terence Crawford should be PORTER's next fight.
      Crawford doesn't have to face mandatory if WBO doesn't require it.

      Or did you forget what happened with Joshua/Usyk?

      WBO called for Joshua to defend first, THEN Usyk spoke about enforcing when Joshua was talking about Fury.

      WBO has to take the first step. Kavaliauskas was the previous mando; that means Porter should be next IF WBO says so. Doesn't matter what Porter says until WBO speaks up.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by revelated View Post
        Crawford doesn't have to face mandatory if WBO doesn't require it.

        Or did you forget what happened with Joshua/Usyk?

        WBO called for Joshua to defend first, THEN Usyk spoke about enforcing when Joshua was talking about Fury.

        WBO has to take the first step. Kavaliauskas was the previous mando; that means Porter should be next IF WBO says so. Doesn't matter what Porter says until WBO speaks up.
        Porter has Al Haymon backing him. Big difference. You really going to pretend like the WBO wouldn't readily accommodate a high profile fight like that for their title and sanctioning fees.

        Comment


        • #34
          Spence needs to keep his mouth shut about fighters he is scared to fight. He wants no part of Crawford.

          Comment


          • #35
            Spence might be damaged goods as well...

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Mister Wolf View Post
              Porter has Al Haymon backing him. Big difference. You really going to pretend like the WBO wouldn't readily accommodate a high profile fight like that for their title and sanctioning fees.
              Apparently not, because they've been repeatedly silent against Crawford. Yet they kept screaming about Joshua not fighting his mando.

              We know the truth, bro. WBO and Bob Arum are in pocket.

              Now that Arum has fallen out of love with Crawford, watch for WBO to make an announcement by year's end.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by revelated View Post
                Apparently not, because they've been repeatedly silent against Crawford. Yet they kept screaming about Joshua not fighting his mando.

                We know the truth, bro. WBO and Bob Arum are in pocket.

                Now that Arum has fallen out of love with Crawford, watch for WBO to make an announcement by year's end.
                And you gonna finally see Shawn Porter wild swinging lighting punching ass get battered. Hopefully you stop fronting on Crawford after the beatdown he delivers.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Mister Wolf View Post
                  And you gonna finally see Shawn Porter wild swinging lighting punching ass get battered. Hopefully you stop fronting on Crawford after the beatdown he delivers.
                  Same thing y'all said about what Spence was going to do. We saw what happened.

                  At some point, you and everyone else on NSB will stop underrating Shawn Porter, and realize that he's the Marvin Hagler of the modern 4 Kings (Spence, Porter, Danny, Thurman)

                  - as in, the 4 guys that actually fight Top 10's in their prime.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by revelated View Post
                    Same thing y'all said about what Spence was going to do. We saw what happened.

                    At some point, you and everyone else on NSB will stop underrating Shawn Porter, and realize that he's the Marvin Hagler of the modern 4 Kings (Spence, Porter, Danny, Thurman)

                    - as in, the 4 guys that actually fight Top 10's in their prime.
                    I'm glad you talking him up. I'm going to hold you to that.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Mister Wolf View Post
                      I'm glad you talking him up. I'm going to hold you to that.
                      I don't need to talk the guy up. NOBODY has dominated Shawn Porter or even seriously hurt him.

                      That's why I want Crawford to take that fight, because it's the ultimate test.

                      If he can get rid of Porter better than Spence, Thurman or Keef did, he'd definitely deserve 50/50 split against Spence assuming Spence gets it done against Danny.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP