The UFC 70% of the time is Better

[M Bison]

I haven’t watch a UFC event yet & I don’t intend to. It just ain’t for me. So please if you like UFC so much why are you in a boxing forum? You must like boxing I mean you wouldn’t catch me in a UFC forum. So just keep watching your thing & stay outta this forum....

Oh no, someone doesn't prefer boxing over UFC/MMA, get out of here!!! Imagine being that guy.

[TMLT87]

TMLT87 is one of those MMA fans that only started watching boxing after the Mcgregor-Mayweather fight. There is a whole group of these mma loving ******s that starting filling up boxing websites after that fight. They think we care about their garbage second rate no money sport.

I was a boxing fan before I was an MMA fan, and ive been an MMA fan since the early 00s. So no. I never gave a single **** about that Floyd/Conor fight anyway. I doubt many people started watching boxing full time because of that ****. Lol @ thinking theres some grand conspiracy of MMA fans giving enough of a **** to flood boxing forums for some weird reason. Theres a more logical explanation - some people just watch both and prefer MMA.

[Straight Up]

I’m a UFC fan but a lot of the time it’s unrefined dog ****. In the Khabib fight, watching Justin Gaethje throwing hooks via Saturn, Mars and your mammas house was horrendous to watch.

He had the technique of inebriated baboon with athletes foot.

There are some good fighters but too often it’s two wrestlers throwing crappy arm punches.

well they are not strikers for a reason. it's the same thing if a mayweather or a tyson go to MMA and throw a roundhouse kick.

[Dakuwaqa]

well they are not strikers for a reason. it's the same thing if a mayweather or a tyson go to MMA and throw a roundhouse kick.

Yeah the point is they don’t do that. I only like MMA specialists. I’m a big Demian Maia fan

[Straight Up]

Yeah the point is they don’t do that. I only like MMA specialists. I’m a big Demian Maia fan

check out Nate Diaz vs Assuncao. That was a good technical ground game.

[fourtheboys96]

UFC undercards is usually better than the top heavy boxing cards.

Better in the sense that upcoming fighters are pitted againts tough oppnents - and they lose.

Nowadays, most boxing undercards have prospects fighting to pad their records.

What I like about MMA, they dont care about losses in the fighters record.

[Removed Now]

TBH the WBC and WBA is making a mockery of boxing with the numerous belts. Nobody knows who the champion is in each division. In UFC there is only one champion per weight class as it should be.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[deowal]

TBH the WBC and WBA is making a mockery of boxing with the numerous belts. Nobody knows who the champion is in each division. In UFC there is only one champion per weight class as it should be.

who gives a **** about belts?

I am tired of hearing this dumb argument. If we woke up tomorrow and there was 1 belt per division, the sport would hardly change. The amount of belts doesn't mean a damn thing. The reason MMA fans care about belts is because 90% of them are former WWE fans. Wrestling fans love the whole belt thing.

[TMLT87]

UFC undercards is usually better than the top heavy boxing cards.

This is true BUT not to anywhere near the extent it used to be. Back in the 00s through early 2010s there were hardly any skippable UFC cards, practically every one felt special. Once the bigger networks got a piece of the action we quickly got into oversaturation territory with the amount of yearly cards literally doubling within the space of a few years, its watered things down a lot. This weekends card for example wouldnt fly 10 years ago.

[boogbx]

I watch both and prefer boxing.

You will also never see me in a MMA forum, women’s boxing forum etc letting everybody know how I feel all up in my emotions like a woman.

Fucc the thread starter and that this thread is on the front page when we have great fights and a great macho Camacho documentary this weekend.