Comments Thread For: Arum on Franco-Moloney Ruling: I Am Absolutely Disgusted!

[moochi]

There was a clash of heads at the 2:08 mark, when Moloney entered and right BEFORE they started rubbing heads on the left side of Franco.

That could have been what Mora saw.

In the NFL if an instant replay review is inconclusive you don't overturn the official call. So I'm ok with the ruling last night.

Let them fight a 3rd time to settle it.

Not at all, they showed other angles and they didn't butt at all.

[GBP4LIFE]

Was definitely a head clash.

At about 2:15 you can hear the rrf clearly say WATCH THE HEAD

Moloney was coming in aggressively with his head all night.

[TheMyspaceDayz]

Was definitely a head clash.

At about 2:15 you can hear the rrf clearly say WATCH THE HEAD

Moloney was coming in aggressively with his head all night.

Angles, boy, angles. We aren’t interested in your once over review

[Joeboxeo]

I almost broke my TV when this horrible decision was made official... This is the same commission did not apparently inspect the Fury's gloves properly in Wilder rematch. NSAC chief Bob Bennett is a charlatan and a crook

[TheBoxGod]

That's not bad, there was a head clash prior to the eye damage. You cannot say without a doubt that that headbutt didn't do it and you can't without a doubt say a jab did it, so the call stands.

Ward was harping on that he doesnt believe that the clash they saying it could be wasn't "SIGNIFICANT" enough to do that damage, but we can't let subjective opinion to sway a standard or else the replay protocol opens itself up to manipulation.

Unless there is clear evidence that the call is wrong the call will stand.

Boxing fans are just too emotional and refuse to check their emotions and opinions at the door and handle the situation unbiasly and professionally.
__________________

[TheMyspaceDayz]

That's not bad, there was a head clash prior to the eye damage. You cannot say without a doubt that that headbutt didn't do it and you can't without a doubt say a jab did it, so the call stands.

Ward was harping on that he doesnt believe that the clash they saying it could be wasn't "SIGNIFICANT" enough to do that damage, but we can't let subjective opinion to sway a standard or else the replay protocol opens itself up to manipulation.

Unless there is clear evidence that the call is wrong the call will stand.

Boxing fans are just too emotional and refuse to check their emotions and opinions at the door and handle the situation unbiasly and professionally.
__________________

Listen to this Robert Byrd muhfucka hahaha

[TheBoxGod]

Listen to this Robert Byrd muhfucka hahaha

Its the truth.

Their was a headbutt, just cause YOU THINK it wasnt that bad or not "SIGNIFICANT" enough liek ward says doesnt mean it wasnt. Cant let your opinions trump protocol.

[Get em up]

I wont argue on here whether it was robbery or not. I will say the jab did the more significant damage to the eye and if the 3rd fight happens itll be hard for Maloney to keep that momentum that he had starting the second fight.

[KayDub]

Not at all, they showed other angles and they didn't butt at all.

https://imgur.com/a/fhl28qy

[KayDub]

That's not bad, there was a head clash prior to the eye damage. You cannot say without a doubt that that headbutt didn't do it and you can't without a doubt say a jab did it, so the call stands.

Ward was harping on that he doesnt believe that the clash they saying it could be wasn't "SIGNIFICANT" enough to do that damage, but we can't let subjective opinion to sway a standard or else the replay protocol opens itself up to manipulation.

Unless there is clear evidence that the call is wrong the call will stand.

Boxing fans are just too emotional and refuse to check their emotions and opinions at the door and handle the situation unbiasly and professionally.
__________________

^ this right here guys

https://imgur.com/a/fhl28qy

There's the headbutt.

Since it's not 100% there wasn't a headbutt they're going to let the ref's ruling stand. That's boxing.