Huh, I literally just said you have to criticize both in the same way...
Yes and Canelo has asterisks too. Crawford has none. No his best win would be a domination of Postol actually. Or Gamboa, who was undefeated and in his prime at that time.
Pretending like Crawford has done nothing, and that Canelo's resume is beyond critique, it really makes you look bad.
Yes and Canelo has asterisks too. Crawford has none. No his best win would be a domination of Postol actually. Or Gamboa, who was undefeated and in his prime at that time.
Pretending like Crawford has done nothing, and that Canelo's resume is beyond critique, it really makes you look bad.

Comment