Top 10 P4P, you’re welcome

[Boxing-1013]

How can any list not have canelo at number 1? Just as he’s been inactive of late...

1 canelo
2
3 Spence/Crawford
4 Fury
5 Inoue

I feel at the moment they are stand outs.
Crawford can’t be number 1 or 2 until he fights Spence.

It depends how you score his fights

[ShoulderRoll]

It depends how you score his fights

Golovkin defenders still bitter. I love to see it.

Win or lose Canelo fights anyone. His combination of resume and skills are obviously top shelf.

[davef]

man i like crawford good fighter but he is missing that defining fight for me i believe he can be number 1 but he needs to clear up WW imo

[Boxing-1013]

Golovkin defenders still bitter. I love to see it.

Win or lose Canelo fights anyone. His combination of resume and skills are obviously top shelf.

Man Crawford's win last night really has you in your feelings huh. Pretty sad that you are so insecure that you derive your self-worth from some dude who sort of looks like you being considered number 1 pfp.

Like if people think Crawford is better pfp than Canelo, who cares? If people think GGG beat Canelo, who cares? They are very valid and mainstream opinions.

You being so quick to challenge and try to X-out those beliefs is pretty pathetic dude.

[Boxing-1013]

Golovkin defenders still bitter. I love to see it.

Win or lose Canelo fights anyone. His combination of resume and skills are obviously top shelf.

Btw he asked how anyone can not have Canelo number 1. I answered his question - a lot of people who don't rate Canelo highly on a list like that, it is because they think he has received a lot of help in his fights. And has maybe cherry-picked some names/situations as well.

Sorry if that hurts your feelings or something

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Poor list IMO. It doesn’t make sense.

Bivol still ain’t really beat anyone, some solid wins but nothing special, yet he’s above Inoue and Canelo.

The #2 only really has the one standout win and that guy he beat isn’t even on the list.

[ShoulderRoll]

Btw he asked how anyone can not have Canelo number 1. I answered his question - a lot of people who don't rate Canelo highly on a list like that, it is because they think he has received a lot of help in his fights. And has maybe cherry-picked some names/situations as well.

Sorry if that hurts your feelings or something

So Canelo cherry picks...but people aren't allowed to criticize Crawford for fighting Kell Brook?

Listen to yourself, dude. You are the biggest hypocrite.

[BoxingIsGreat]

No Disrespect but:


What does P4P Mean to you and WTF is your Criteria for P4P...Just Curious!

Starting to think that most people including Many Writer and so called Boxing Experts just don't understand the true CONCEPT of P4P

Best post of the thread.

[Boxing-1013]

So Canelo cherry picks...but people aren't allowed to criticize Crawford for fighting Kell Brook?

Listen to yourself, dude. You are the biggest hypocrite.

It's all relative numbnuts.

When you fawn over Canelo in this scenario, but make threads and post trying to hate on Crawford etc, it exposes you.

If you have a much different opinion about this fight, vs say your opinion on Canelo vs Kov (better win than Brook but still a cherry) and Fielding (worse win and also a big cherry) then you look really really biased. So keep doing you.

[ShoulderRoll]

It's all relative numbnuts.

When you fawn over Canelo in this scenario, but make threads and post trying to hate on Crawford etc, it exposes you.

If you have a much different opinion about this fight, vs say your opinion on Canelo vs Kov (better win than Brook but still a cherry) and Fielding (worse win and also a big cherry) then you look really really biased. So keep doing you.

How is it relative? If you are going to criticize someone for cherrypicking then you you have to criticize Crawford for choosing Kell Brook.

You can't have it both ways.

And at least Canelo has other big name fighters on his resume to more than offset Rocky Fielding. Crawford's best win might be Jeff Horn.