I would love to see on Dec 2nd Margarito against Quintana and Cotto against Urkal...That would be the ****.
Cotto vs. Urkal December 2nd?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by borikuaI would love to see on Dec 2nd Margarito against Quintana and Cotto against Urkal...That would be the ****.
That's a good double header
I hope this one happens as is.
Comment
-
I can understand Cotto's position because he is a moving up fighter but why would Hatton be bad mouthed by taking on Urkal? He is supposed to be a mandatory, right?Originally posted by Shanus16Cotto is getting the heads up for this fight, yet when Hatton considered it, he was getting badmouthed?
I'll never understand some people.Comment
-
Are you sure? I've never heard any comment from Hatton's team saying that they wanted to face Urkal...Originally posted by Shanus16Cotto is getting the heads up for this fight, yet when Hatton considered it, he was getting badmouthed?
I'll never understand some people.Comment
-
Miguelito broke Torres' cherry. There's no way Torres will let him get away that. I read that in an interview from this Colombian site.Comment
-
He was being badmouthed for not taking the rematch with Collazo. Many ringside observers, press, and boxing fans thought Collazo won that fight so that's why they were bashing Ricky.Originally posted by Shanus16Cotto is getting the heads up for this fight, yet when Hatton considered it, he was getting badmouthed?
I'll never understand some people.
Also, Urkal has done nothing to deserve a title fight. He lost to Harris twice, once by knock-out, and beat three tomato cans at 147, none of them ranked in the top 25 by the WBA, yet he's being given a title shot. He doesn't deserve it.
Cotto has held a title at 140 for a while now so there is no reason he shouldn't deserve a title shot at 147.Comment
-
Both of them deserve a belt over Margarito, I say one plans on fighting Mag for his belt, and one goes for the vacant, I'm tried of Margarito standing around doing nothing.Comment
to your mom..
Comment