Does Spence deserve to be above Fury on P4P list?

[BillyBoxing]

Spence is number 4 on ESPN, CBS 5 on the RING.

Fury is 7 on CBS, 8 on ESPN, not even in the RING top 10.


I would take ANYDAY Klitschko schooling 12-0 decision and Deontay Wilder beat down over a SD over Porter (who lost most of his big fights) and a Brook TKO.

Klit had been undefeated for years, so was Wilder, Brook was coming from a TKO loss and Porter lost all of his big fights except Garcia.

I was not impressed with the Mickey Garcia win. Garcia was short and fat in there.

It just that eye test, IQ, record, results, Fury seems like a better boxer to me than Spence.

Only thing that can drop Fury under Spence is the fact that he got caught once for a banned substance, it has to count too.

If Spence beat Bud, he can be P4P king, no problem.

But what's yall opinion?

[removed]

Fury is p4p #1

[Earl-Hickey]

Yes

I mean what would a welterweight Fury be like

He'd have to be tall for the division so like 6'3", he'd have a great chin, very solid power, great movement, a lot of ring intelligence, can fight inside and on the back foot.

What welterweights have all those listed abilities?

None.

P4P is on skillset and ability and there's no fighters out there with the combination of abilities fury has, none.

[Jax teller]

Yes

I mean what would a welterweight Fury be like

He'd have to be tall for the division so like 6'3", he'd have a great chin, very solid power, great movement, a lot of ring intelligence, can fight inside and on the back foot.

What welterweights have all those listed abilities?

None.

P4P is on skillset and ability and there's no fighters out there with the combination of abilities fury has, none.

Fury would be around 3'7" at welter if we are proportionally scaling height by weight.

He's getting walked down.

[Clegg]

Fury has the better resume, and that will still be true after Spence beats Garcia. Spence is a great fighter but has yet to beat the best in his division

[QueensburyRules]

Spence is number 4 on ESPN, CBS 5 on the RING.

Fury is 7 on CBS, 8 on ESPN, not even in the RING top 10.


I would take ANYDAY Klitschko schooling 12-0 decision and Deontay Wilder beat down over a SD over Porter (who lost most of his big fights) and a Brook TKO.

Klit had been undefeated for years, so was Wilder, Brook was coming from a TKO loss and Porter lost all of his big fights except Garcia.

I was not impressed with the Mickey Garcia win. Garcia was short and fat in there.

It just that eye test, IQ, record, results, Fury seems like a better boxer to me than Spence.

Only thing that can drop Fury under Spence is the fact that he got caught once for a banned substance, it has to count too.

If Spence beat Bud, he can be P4P king, no problem.

But what's yall opinion?

- -Santa gives U U own Billygoat to buck with...yohoho!

[boliodogs]

On my pound for pound 10 best list Spence is number 3 and Fury is not on my list.

[boliodogs]

Yes

I mean what would a welterweight Fury be like

He'd have to be tall for the division so like 6'3", he'd have a great chin, very solid power, great movement, a lot of ring intelligence, can fight inside and on the back foot.

What welterweights have all those listed abilities?

None.

P4P is on skillset and ability and there's no fighters out there with the combination of abilities fury has, none.

I don't agree about his great chin. He has been hurt and knocked down a few times and average puncher Cunningham dropped him for a 7 count and had him hurt. Spence has never been down or hurt much. you are the one listing all these abilities and that is just your opinion not facts. Fact is there are 1400 pro heavyweights and 2400 pro welterweights. my opinion is welterweight is a stronger weight class with better fighters. Fury is the best active heavyweight in my opinion.That would make him better than AJ, Wilder, Ortiz and Ruiz but how good are they?