Ring Mag Forcing it on Klit-Maskaev Possibility

[Easy-E]

Wow, I would have though you'd like me after all the nice stuff I wrote on Floyd yesterday. At least I'm getting paid to be terrible and ignorant.

Who cares whether you think Floyd is great or Floyd sucks.
You still are ignorant.
Fair enough.

[Nautilus]

I'd say Wlad yes and have no problem with anyone seeing him as #1 after Brewster lost to Liak; however, Wlad was KO'd by Brewster in a fight that I gurantee HE though was for a 'piece' of the title (and how sad to even have to write that). So how can Wlad-Oleg be for the 'real' title when the man who beat Wlad, and the man who beat him, ain't in the equation? Brewster was at least as credible as Rahman prior to Sergei (he should have lost to Meehan but he didn't get **** stomped by Ruiz) and so Oleg just magically appears as #2 when he's the only other titlist likely to face Wlad? C'mon.

i don't follow your logic... brewster has just lost to liakhovich... and you suggest this should move him up to number 2 ahead of oleg and liakhovich?

[Easy-E]

i don't follow your logic... brewster has just lost to liakhovich... and you suggest this should move him up to number 2 ahead of oleg and liakhovich?

That paragraph is some of the most senseless rambling i have ever encountered.
I cant believe this guy is a "professional" writer.

[crold1]

LOL...the column makes clear my position but it's fun to be baited by PBF34.