Originally posted by Sid-Knee
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Joshua: Wilder Admitted It, We Made Him a Lucrative Offer
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Squ□redCircle34 View PostStop it, you’re actually missing the point!
Did Hearns ask Wilder to meet with him when they tried to fleece him with that bs flat fee offer!?
What about Hearns lying saying that the fight isn’t worth 100 mill when afterwards he said in America is where the fight will draw the most money for that!
See Hearns is trying to control the narrative now that Wilder lost and plus many are misinterpreting on what Wilder said about the AJ fight!
He never said he didn’t want to fight over Fury, he basically said he got offered more but rather bet on himself and beat Fury and then come to the negotiating table with AJ on better terms!
They have refused to meet with him multiple times though.
Wilder has now admitted, out of his own mouth, that he was offered more money to fight AJ than he earned for fighting Fury, and that he turned the offer down and picked Fury instead.
Fair enough, but don't turn down an offer to fight for the undisputed HW title, then go around crying and complaining to everybody that the guy who made the offer is ducking you!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Squ□redCircle34;20863978
He never said he didn’t want to fight over Fury,[Bhe basically said he got offered more but rather bet on himself and beat Fury and then come to the negotiating table with AJ on better terms![/B]
This is what he actually said: "You know I was offered more money to fight Joshua than I was getting to fight you."
Not quite the same as your version, is it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Squared.Circle View PostAs much as I don't like Wilder, it's important to note that he's talking specifically about the $100m offer before the rematch. A lot of people seem to think he's talking about an offer before Wilder vs. Fury 1. However, he's still admitting he turned it down in order to face Fury, which is contrary to what they said at the time..."we turned it down because they wouldn't tell us what AJ was earning, among other things (of which none were ever revealed, and now we know why, because the only reason was a straight duck lol)". Just saying.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostAnd here you idiots go rehashing some old argument over a couple of public statements. The entire heavyweight landscape is different and here go common folk arguing to protect the reputation of millionaire athletes.
There were massive arguments here, many people were buying into Wilders bs. When you can see the truth and watch others call you foolish for believing the truth, you kind of get a "told you so" rush when proven right.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostIt's a fucking Newspaper headline!
Where do you get your news from ? Do you have Joshua, Wilder, Haymon, Hearn, and Finkel on speed dial ? You only believe the info you get directly from them, and don’t waste your time with fake news media. Ok. Got it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JLC View Post...... what ? What is your point ?
Where do you get your news from ? Do you have Joshua, Wilder, Haymon, Hearn, and Finkel on speed dial ? You only believe the info you get directly from them, and don’t waste your time with fake news media. Ok. Got it.
Nothing! Lol. The hack who wrote that story would have spent 10 mins skim reading Sky Sports articles to find out who Deontay Wilder was and why Eddie Hearn was talking about him, then poured himself a glass of liquid inspiration to come up with a nice click bait headline!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Squ□redCircle34 View PostRevisionist history at its finest, the Joshua vs Wilder negotiations was one of the most inexplicable ways a fighter could duck someone especially out of undisputed!
AJ gave Parker who’s unknown a percentage while tried to fleece Wilder by giving him a flat fee, anyone in negotiations knows you don’t accept a flat fee as a Champion especially if your undefeated and it’s for all the belts!
AJ also reneged from his own demand of he wanted 50 million to fight and then was offered and turned down his own demand, that’s as blatant as it gets!
Hearns admitted on camera that the money was legit but that Joshua don’t care about extra money and wanted the fight in England for his fans yet he wanted 100% of purse split lol
Let’s not also forget how when Wilder was about to sign that bs contract with no date or venue an with Hearns signature on it instead of Joshua’s (Eddie Hearn special) Hearns started throwing out how Joshua has to do his WBA mandatory and had a 24 hour deadline!
To this day Joshua deep down knows what would’ve happened if he fought Wilder, after he lost to Ruiz he admitted that he wished he rather lost to Wilder instead lol
Anyways hopefully Fury vs Joshua can happen and Wilder files a lawsuit on his team cuz they withheld lots of facts an info from him honestly!
Parker was given a percentage which amounted to 6/8 million far below what Wilder was offered . Parker also had a few PPV events , Wilder never did PPV until he fought Fury ,he had no big following to get any leverage on asking for more then 12.5 million coming in with a 2 million career high pay day to his name .Last edited by REDEEMER; 11-05-2020, 10:05 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fire4231 View PostWe will just let this sit out there so people can see how chunk thinks. We can’t expect you to stay sane chained to a computer in your one legged mothers basement. And damn she be whooping your @ss.
Are you telling me you don't understand the ability to measure the quality between fighters resumes, and which fighters have beaten a higher level of opponent and how often they do so? You're actually this idiotic? Hahahahahaha.
Who is talking about whether AJ is number 1 or not??? Who is talking about him losing 3 in a row or not and remaining at number 1? Man, i've seen some crack babies in my time but...
The rest of the first part just makes it that much more hilarious, but in a very chilling way due to the village idiot being detached from logic and reality in this extreme of a way. Haha.
What is worthy about a load of fighters who haven't proven anything at world level? Should i just list a load of British fighters who lack the credentials too and cast them off as top fighters anyway? Your standards aren't just low... They're American. Haha. Which is the lowest of the low. I sneer at you cabbage. I pity you for lacking the capabilities to acknowledge sense and reality like we civilised people do. Hahahaha. WOW!!!! You actually exist. And there's just so many of you...
Nyambayar would beat Warrington and Galahad? Hahahaha. They wouldn't lose a round to him. They'd beat him silly in one sided dominant fashion. They'd beat him the same way Fury beat your coward. FOH you creature...
Russell, the guy who has ducked his whole career, is being ducked by Warrington and Galahad? The guy who fights once a year against utter garbage and is nothing more than a Deontay Wilder level "Champ"?? Hahahaha. What offers were sent by this nobodies side? Oh that's right, his side don't send offers to the top guys do they? They just send them to all the bums that PBC like to feast on. But when massive offers are sent to these pointless frauds, they're always turned down.
Tank doesn't have a couple of good wins in Pedraza and Cruz? What, he has more or something? Well, with American level minds and the consistency of which you fight utter trash, it's not surprising that your little brain is unable to recognise what an actual world class fighter looks like.
You are a peasant who is clearly beneath me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostWTF would a Daily Telegraph reporter know or care about boxing?
Nothing! Lol. The hack who wrote that story would have spent 10 mins skim reading Sky Sports articles to find out who Deontay Wilder was and why Eddie Hearn was talking about him, then poured himself a glass of liquid inspiration to come up with a nice click bait headline!
There were TWO links, from TWO different publications, one linking you directly to a THIRD link to the TELEGRAPH whom Eddie Hearn actually made the direct quote too. It’s crazy the lengths you’re going to right now to deny what actually happened, and what’s actually printed in black and white in 3 different places. Coming from Eddie Hearns mouth no less.
Comment
Comment