Why is it a draw?

[Kezzer]

It’s reasonable enough as it is , as it discounts for one bad scorecard. Obviously we have seen more than one before but it reduces the risk.

Similarly - if you had a fight where judges 1&2 score the fight 1 point to fighter A; but judge 3 gave a landslide to fighter B you could argue on aggregate fighter B won. But on the same basis it’s a majority win for fighter A.

To me this seems to the fairest solution.

[BM dnobagaV]

You're talking about a unanimous draw which is very rare. There are 3 kinds. 2 judges scores a draw and one a winner is a Majority Draw. 2 judges score a win for each fighter and one a draw is a Split Draw then the UD which is pretty obvious.

Has a unanimous draw ever happened?

[YoungManRumble]

Has a unanimous draw ever happened?

There was one recently actually. Early this month or last month I believe. Think it was on a UK card.

Yeah just did a quick search was early September.


https://boxrec.com/en/event/814505/2531530

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=855349

This one too from some quick research

https://boxrec.com/en/event/567417/1380130

[JakeTheBoxer]

Good result for boxing. Spence doesn`t have to fight the winner, because there is no winner. Danny -Spence winner should fight Crawford - Brook winner.

[musiol]

Oh I get it. Just saying I don't get it if you get my drift.

Obviously it's a majority win if say Clayton wins 2 cards and Sergiy one.
But Clayton winning one should break the tie.

Your not bright eh

['b']

Your not bright eh

Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.






















(also, it's *you're...just before anyone else rubs it in)

[boliodogs]

That is the way it is done and always has been and always will be. It won't change because you don't like it or you don't get it or agree with it. I think the current system is fine as is. One judge said a guy won and two judges say it was a draw then it's a draw . Majority rules and one judge does not overrule the other two. It is simple and fair and correct.

[MasterPlan]

That is the way it is done and always has been and always will be. It won't change because you don't like it or you don't get it or agree with it. I think the current system is fine as is. One judge said a guy won and two judges say it was a draw then it's a draw . Majority rules and one judge does not overrule the other two. It is simple and fair and correct.

I know the rules and what not, just stating I never cared for them.

I was just using this fight as an example.