Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Teofimo Lopez on Loma Rematch: F--k Him!, I'm The King Now!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Teofimo will take less for beatable opposition. He's not the first, Salido and Juan Manuel Marquez both did it, they won they run.
    Last edited by factsarenice; 10-24-2020, 09:11 AM.

    Comment


    • #82
      Common knowledge: Arum, "I don't do rematch clauses."

      Originally posted by QballLobo View Post
      He and his team weren’t smart enough to put a rematch clause in the deal.
      Teo is right to tell them to F off unless it’s on his terms.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by IAMTHAT View Post
        He never does - Lomachenko never had a rematch clause in any of his fights. Many boxers don't. This was not a Teo specific decision.
        Which is something I've never understood when it's a champion who doesn't have the clause in their contract. Maybe it's fianancial.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by SUBZER0ED View Post
          If Lopez had wiped the floor with Lomachenko, I could see the rematch turn down. But the fight was competitive, despite Vasyl taking more than half the fight to get started. And if the shoulder injury story prior to the fight is legit, it means that Lomachenko would give Teofimo even more trouble in a rematch and he knows it. Given that, refusing to fight Lomachenko again makes Lopez look like a bitch.
          Like Juan Marquez, he won and he'll run.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by KeepAmericaGr8t View Post
            People are calling Loma arrogant and not this El Telefono kid? Holy cow!
            Yeah I noticed that too. If you don't like arrogance then you can't like Lopez. I wonder where all this talk of arrogance is coming from? I've never heard Loma say anything more arrogant than the average boxer.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
              Which is something I've never understood when it's a champion who doesn't have the clause in their contract. Maybe it's fianancial.
              It's financial to BOB....Bob doesn't do rematches. Blowing out the two best makes every other fight just seem ok and the TV contract needs content. No rematch means lots of lead up fights, build up and a second chance to make millions on PPV.

              Sometimes fighters like Marquez and Salido feel like they don't want to take that chance again for any amount of money.

              Comment


              • #87
                Marquez and Salido didn't want to take that chance again. No shame in that, it's a big risk.


                Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                It was pretty arrogant of the Lomachenko side not to have a rematch clause in the contract.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
                  Marquez and Salido didn't want to take that chance again. No shame in that, it's a big risk.
                  They were low-balling Salido with the money offered for the rematch. Sean Gibbons is on record about it.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP