My Devolping Boxing Reform To Restore Order and Glory To The Sport! [IN DEVOLPMENT]

**Mike_b** · 10-21-2020, 07:06 PM

I think teddy would rub your head like he did to timmy after the Pacquiao- horn fight! That's a good thing lol

**edgarg** · 10-21-2020, 08:21 PM

Originally posted by TheBoxGod

I would Standardized The Boxing Commission, have them regulate boxing.

They will only allow 1 Sanctioning Body (The New WBC), and this sanctioning body can only collect 5% Sanctioning Fees of which 85% must be allocated back into boxing and must mandatory provide paid drug testing for all championship and intermim fights and paid Health Insurance for retired former WBC Champions.

Sanctioning Breakdown

Every Champion must aim to fight 2 times every 10 months with at least 1 of those fights being the mandatory challenger (#1 ranked in the division). If a fighter cannot defend the title against the #1 ranked Challenger in a 10 month period he will be stripped of the title and #1 and #2 will fight for the Vacant Champion title. When/if the stripped champions returns within 6 months of being stripped he may challenge for the Title of the Newly Crowned Champion's new Mandatory super-ceding the now #1 Mandatory ranked fighter.

Ranking Breakdown
(every top 10 ranked fighter must fight at least 2 times every 10 months, with atleast 1 mandatory)

#Champion: Defeated the previous champion and now is the top ranked fighter in the division desginated the "CHAMPION"
#1: (ranked #1 to the champion aka Intermim Holder is inline for immediate title fight as the "CHAMPION's" mandatory, must also have a victory over "at the time" the #2 or #3 in the last 12 months. #1 ranked fighter does not have to fight anyone but his mandatory inside of the Champions first Mandatory window.
#2: (ranked #2 because previous #2 took #1 spot as previous #1 challenged for the champion title which he won or lost which changed his rankings. #2 ranked fighter must face the #3 inside of 10 months of acquring the #2 ranking.
#3: (#3 ranked fighter must have defeated the #4 ranked fighter in the past 10 months. #3 Ranked fighter is either the loser of #2 vs #3 or the winner of #3 vs #4.
#4: (#4 ranked fighter must face the #3 inside of 10 months of acquring the #2 ranking.
#5: (must face the newl,y dethroned champion and the winner of this bout will be placed #4 ranked to the champion, if #5 lost this fight he drops to #10

* Every fighter who defeats a top 10 ranked fighter will assume that fighters rank and every fighter who loses a fight to a top 10 fighter will assume that fighters rank and if a lost is to a fighter outside the top 10 ranked fighters that fighter will assume the rank 11th.

Scoring Boxing And Fairness

Fighters recourse for bad scoring. (contested score)
A Fighter may petition for a rescore of a bad scorecard through the boxing commission, their is a mandatory ($5000) fee that will be paid out of the New WBC 5% sanctioning fee by the NEW WBC or if a its a fight where no scanction fee were collected the fee must be paid by the fighter in advanced (non refundable).

- The boxing comission will keep 5 additional local judgees on hand to score alongside the 3 ringside judges, for; if a figher chose to contest a scorecard these 5 judges will hand over their score cards to be tallied and avaeraged and if a more than 3 or more round swing discrepency is present the new average scorecard will become the new scorecard to count as teh offical socrecard replacing the orginal "bad" score card.

Judges for championship fights must not have been involved in a contested scorecard in the past 10 fights or 10 months whichever satisfyies this requirement.

*****This is just me having fun playing BOXING GOD! leave your comments what you think I should implement etc, this isnt done I plan to write out a entire manual for no reason other than idle hands.

This good idea has been tried by many others many times. Never got off the ground. Too many greedy interests would lose their positions and graft.

By the way...what does "devolp" mean. You use it twice. This is a new word to ne , I thought I'd heard almost every word in the English Lexicon but I see I'm wrong.

**TheBoxGod** · 10-21-2020, 09:20 PM

Originally posted by edgarg

This good idea has been tried by many others many times. Never got off the ground. Too many greedy interests would lose their positions and graft.

By the way...what does "devolp" mean. You use it twice. This is a new word to ne , I thought I'd heard almost every word in the English Lexicon but I see I'm wrong.

Idk what devolp is ask mozilla i just use right click correction.

And yeah I know a more sane approach to the sport is out of the question cause of the cesspool that is boxing with the amount of individuals who have their hands in the cookie jar but one thing I wanted to try and do is find a way to improve boxing and its scoring, meanwhile help the boxers the most and keep the integrity of the sport intact and structure the sport more so as a sport with its backbone rooted in competition. This is just fun and obviously I dont expect anyone who matters to read it and be like YES THIS IS ALL WE NEEDED. I just did this cause instead of complaining I figured I can write up my own bylaws and see how hard is it and its actually pretty complex moreso than you would think. Its not enough to say "the best must fight the best" but what does that actually mean, how do you decide who is the best, now how do you force them to fight each other while keeping it fair for them to make their money fights aswell. how do you keep a belt from being hostage, how do you keep the rankings moving and how do you allow fighters to break into the rankings etc etc. Its alot more indepth than jsu syaing "the best must fight the best"

**xxlefthookxx** · 10-22-2020, 09:28 AM

1. Establish 2 tiers of fighters--club level (tier 2) elite (tier 1).
2. Tier 1 must have 24/7/365 VADA and full health care coverage. (Put financial burder on the promoter--prevents fighters who are not worth the investment from getting the license)
3. Tournaments yearly based on independent rankings. champ v 4, 2 v 3, winners face each other. 5 v 8, 6 v 7, winners face each other. This way they can 'earn' their way into the top 4 for the next year.
4. Champ can have an optional 3rd fight vs anyone (tier 1) during the year after the tourney.

**boliodogs** · 10-22-2020, 09:44 AM

That is the way boxing should be but isn't and probably never will be. These are not new ideas. All boxing fans want these things to happen and have wanted them to happen for decades. But they don't happen and probably never will happen. Only one good honest boxing organization. Only one champion per weight class. Champion fighting twice a year and fighting the best contender once a year. All boxing fans want that but will never get it.

**edgarg** · 10-22-2020, 05:56 PM

Originally posted by TheBoxGod

Idk what devolp is ask mozilla i just use right click correction.

And yeah I know a more sane approach to the sport is out of the question cause of the cesspool that is boxing with the amount of individuals who have their hands in the cookie jar but one thing I wanted to try and do is find a way to improve boxing and its scoring, meanwhile help the boxers the most and keep the integrity of the sport intact and structure the sport more so as a sport with its backbone rooted in competition. This is just fun and obviously I dont expect anyone who matters to read it and be like YES THIS IS ALL WE NEEDED. I just did this cause instead of complaining I figured I can write up my own bylaws and see how hard is it and its actually pretty complex more so than you would think. Its not enough to say "the best must fight the best" but what does that actually mean, how do you decide who is the best, now how do you force them to fight each other while keeping it fair for them to make their money fights aswell. how do you keep a belt from being hostage, how do you keep the rankings moving and how do you allow fighters to break into the rankings etc etc. Its alot more indepth than jsu syaing "the best must fight the best"

You deserve plaudits for your position. I also had an idea to clarify the cesspit of boxing. But whilst I mentioned it, nobody commented. It was like a foreign language. This;

I was, when young, a multisport guy. Mostly at tournament level. So it occurred to me that the way my early boxing experiences , fighting in an organised League, was similar to a major tennis or table-tennis tournament. In tennis there are limited spots, and the winners advance. In table tennis there are unlimited entries, but eventually they get whittled down as the winners advance, and the losers drop out or compete for subordinate prizes.

The problem is that Boxing is too Big and too extensive globally for this. But a solution might be that local area tournaments could be held with winners advancing to the more major venues.

The KILLER is that what do the losers do to earn a living from the available scraps. And the manager Promoters, trainers bucket holders and other hangers-on and "Uncle Tom Cobbley and all....."

I admire you intent and wish you all success. I'd like to see what you write here after you get input from the first Promoter you approach. The Commissions would violently oppose putting themselves out of rake-off Jobs. As would the WBC, IBF WBO guys who scam the fighters and promoters by their "fees"... People like those in the under-seam of this and other sports, could employ "hit-men".... In a way it's much like the unfolding ***** scandal.
Layers, upon layers upon layers, almost ad infinitum.

Eventually I gave up as the magnititude began revealing itself to me.

**Superbee** · 10-22-2020, 06:05 PM

Or just be Dana White and rule everything...

My Devolping Boxing Reform To Restore Order and Glory To The Sport! [IN DEVOLPMENT]