Ring belt on the line if Barrera loses?

**PATO 1** · 08-17-2006, 10:51 AM

dont understand how someone who has lost 3 out of 4

and someone who lost to the guy who lost 3 out of 4 only to beat him in a re-match and before that get a lucky draw vs marquez should fight for the RING BELT

**daggerdeux** · 08-17-2006, 10:56 AM

Originally posted by El Temible

dont understand how someone who has lost 3 out of 4

and someone who lost to the guy who lost 3 out of 4 only to beat him in a re-match and before that get a lucky draw vs marquez should fight for the RING BELT

Then tell me who should fight for the Ring Belt?

**PATO 1** · 08-17-2006, 11:00 AM

winner of pacquiao v morales , and barrios v guzman

**daggerdeux** · 08-17-2006, 11:08 AM

Originally posted by El Temible

winner of pacquiao v morales , and barrios v guzman

So you mean they have to go through Barrios and Guzman to get the ring belt. What about adding Valero to the mix.

**PATO 1** · 08-17-2006, 11:11 AM

so imo it should be joan guzman v manny pacquiao , as i think they win their respective fights

valero is a good fighter but......

**Chups** · 08-17-2006, 11:45 AM

Originally posted by El Temible

winner of pacquiao v morales , and barrios v guzman

Barrios is rated at number 5 and Guzman (who's fairly new to junior lightweight) is rated at number 10. Somebody who's been reading the RING mag shouldn't be surprised at their ratings...each of the top fighters climbed their way to their positions through the years. The winner of the Barrios-Guzman can only go as high as number 4 or 5 in the ratings...not enough to vie for a Ring belt.

On the other hand if MAB wins he'll stay at number two and a box-off between MAB vs. the winner of EM-PAC is an automatic RING belt championship fight.

MAB (2) vs Juarez (6) > Barrios (5) vs. Guzman (10)

and Pac (1) vs. EM (3) KICK ALL THEIR ASSES IN IMPORTANCE FOR THE RING BELT SIGNIFICANCE.

**Chups** · 08-17-2006, 11:51 AM

Originally posted by El Temible

dont understand how someone who has lost 3 out of 4

and someone who lost to the guy who lost 3 out of 4 only to beat him in a re-match and before that get a lucky draw vs marquez should fight for the RING BELT

This is a junior lightweight category.
(Before MAB vs. EM III, Morales was at number 1)

When MAB won he kicked Morales down the ratings to somewhere around number 4 or 5. When he won against Pacquiao he went up again at number 2. THE RAHEEM FIGHT WAS A T LIGHTWEIGHT. (No significance to the the junior lightweight ratings). When Morales lost to Pac he went down to 3 and kicked Pac up to 1.

**Katz** · 08-17-2006, 06:04 PM

if MAB lost then Morales will automatically #2...

The Grand Finale will for The Ring belt.

**mic573** · 08-17-2006, 06:19 PM

Originally posted by Chups

Could it be feasible?
The match between Pacquiao and Morales will be recognized by the Ring Magazine as a Championship fight if Juarez wins against belted Champion Marco Antonio Barrera. Pacquiao currently at number 1 and Morales at number 3 contender at the Ring ratings was perceived to have been refused by Ring editor Nigel Collins as a Championship fight. On September 16 a match between current number 2 contender Marco Antonio Barrera and Rocky Juarez is on schedule. A win by Rocky would certainly dethrone the alphabet belt champion from his throne and kick Morales to a number 2 spot. Thus making the match on November 18 a regulated Championship fight box-off of number 1 & 2.

What do you say? Pacfans let's cheer for Juarez...Nyahahahaha!!

If that happens then The Ring belt becomes a worthless joke.

Barrera is The Ring champion and if Juarez wins then he becomes The Ring champion. That has been thier policy.

Ring belt on the line if Barrera loses?