How Is Lopez p4p But Not Josh Taylor?

**bluebeam** · 10-19-2020, 07:58 PM

Originally posted by ThunderFists

So lopez basically beat the smaller commey whose best win is mid 30s beltran and lomachenko whose a natural 126-130 and people are saying hes p4p but i barely see anyone mention taylor whose past 5 opponents had a combined record of like 110-1, 3 of which were world champs/former champs and won the ali trophy never being mentioned. Whats with the double standards?

The winner of taylor/ramirez will enter the p4p top 10 on my list

**RJJ-94-02=GOAT** · 10-19-2020, 08:08 PM

Both are on my list. After Taylor dominates Ramirez I’d like to see Taylor vs Lopez in a battle of undisputed champs. First time it would have ever happened in the 4 belt era I believe.

**Marchegiano** · 10-19-2020, 08:09 PM

Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT

Both are on my list. After Taylor dominates Ramirez I�d like to see Taylor vs Lopez in a battle of undisputed champs. First time it would have ever happened in the 4 era I believe.

I Like how strongly you feel about Josh, I'm still on the fence on that one.

But, Lopez vs the winner does sound ****ing excellent.

**RJJ-94-02=GOAT** · 10-19-2020, 08:14 PM

Originally posted by Marchegiano

I Like how strongly you feel about Josh, I'm still on the fence on that one.

But, Lopez vs the winner does sound ****ing excellent.

One of those guys I watched as an amateur and saw something special in, so I�m fully driving that hype train.

Yeah it�d be a special fight man. Like Bob Foster jumping up and fighting Frazier the two undisputed champions of each division going toe to toe. Taylor-Lopez would be a lot more competitive though.

I always thought Roy and BHop should have done it around 2002 when both held the majority of the belts in their respective divisions.

**JimmyValmer** · 10-19-2020, 10:32 PM

Stfu you loma dykerider ! Loma had 4 fights at 135 he had enough time to adjust to the weight. Defeated 2 champions on the process.

**Legends456** · 10-19-2020, 10:45 PM

Originally posted by ThunderFists

So lopez basically beat the smaller commey whose best win is mid 30s beltran and lomachenko whose a natural 126-130 and people are saying hes p4p but i barely see anyone mention taylor whose past 5 opponents had a combined record of like 110-1, 3 of which were world champs/former champs and won the ali trophy never being mentioned. Whats with the double standards?

I really like Josh Taylor, but he looks a bit slow and plodding TBH. However, he’s a great inside fighter and has shown he can adjust — he doesn’t get nervous either, which is huge. He reminds me a bit of Andre Ward (they both had similar styles to compensate for their short reaches), but I need to see him in more tough fights with elites. He did great against Prograis, in a fight I’d thought he’d lose ... it was still awful close though and IMO could have been scored a draw.

Let’s wait and see how he does with Ramirez. If he gets through him he has a shot against Lopez.

**Ca$ual Fan** · 10-19-2020, 10:52 PM

Taylor-Ramirez winner vs Lopez

Winner is a lock top 3 p4p

Crawford vs winner is a lock #1

**Qbox** · 10-19-2020, 10:59 PM

Lopez is american, you haven't worked this **** out yet? Same reason one of the judges had it 119-109!
Broner was p4p early on, FFS that's all you need to know!

**Ochoa780** · 10-19-2020, 11:03 PM

He just won all the titles and beat a p4p fighter.. Idk what else there is to say

Love to see him fight the winner of the ramirez fight at 140, I think he would be well suited for 140

How Is Lopez p4p But Not Josh Taylor?