Loma should have incorporated the shoulder roll in his defense. It was astoundingly ****** how his defense was keeping his hands high and circling like a person who is having their 3rd ever sparring match.
Last night wasn't Teo winning. It was Loma losing.
Collapse
-
-
There is NO excuse made. Loma chose to lose that fight.
Go back and watch it again. Loma threw NOT ONE PUNCH in Round 1.Comment
-
lomo looked like a journeyman being badly beaten and bullied all around the boxing ring.This is what you DIDN'T hear at the post-fight presser. But it's exactly what was going through the minds of both fighters.
Loma lost because he chose to lose with a faulty strategy. Period.
Just like Srisaket chose to lose against Estrada in the rematch.
Just like Choco chose to lose against Srisaket in the first fight.
Just like Manny chose to lose against Floyd.
Just like Judah chose to lose against Paulie.
Just like Broner chose to lose against Porter.
Just like Mikey chose to lose against Spence.
Despite the vast majority of NSB predicting a knockout, Lomachenko was never hurt by this man except in round 12 when he threw for the fences and got clipped a couple of times.
Lomachenko fought the wrong fight in the first half. It cost him. Period.
Second half, Lopez was eating punches that made him repeatedly reset and had no answer for. Loma could have been done with it in Round 11 straight up - Lopez was tired. Loma didn't do it. Just like Manny didn't finish Horn in Round 9 like he should have.
And we see what happens when fighters don't finish.
So...Lopez got his hand raised amidst sketchy scorecards. It's fine he got his hand raised. But what I saw isn't what Max Kellerman saw. I saw a Loma who had a crap strategy giving away a fight. I saw a Lopez who had not improved his defense at all from the Nagatani fight.
In a rematch, Loma wins if only because Lopez wouldn't be as focused.
bumachenko was trying his hardest to just not get badly hurt and injured by teofo tbh.Comment
-
Sometimes when a fighter fights too cerebral inside of a ring? They can stall their attacks, because they are trying to analyse the situation too much etc
Lopez made Lomachenko think and stall 'But a more hot headed fighter or instinctual fighter, would just go on the attack after a short evaluation period'.
So all in all, he suffered the same fate as Bernard Hopkins 'Although Hopkin's was not beaten as conclusively as Lomachenko against Taylor'.Comment
-
Another clown poster who should have a negative karma rating lol.This is what you DIDN'T hear at the post-fight presser. But it's exactly what was going through the minds of both fighters.
Loma lost because he chose to lose with a faulty strategy. Period.
Just like Srisaket chose to lose against Estrada in the rematch.
Just like Choco chose to lose against Srisaket in the first fight.
Just like Manny chose to lose against Floyd.
Just like Judah chose to lose against Paulie.
Just like Broner chose to lose against Porter.
Just like Mikey chose to lose against Spence.
Despite the vast majority of NSB predicting a knockout, Lomachenko was never hurt by this man except in round 12 when he threw for the fences and got clipped a couple of times.
Lomachenko fought the wrong fight in the first half. It cost him. Period.
Second half, Lopez was eating punches that made him repeatedly reset and had no answer for. Loma could have been done with it in Round 11 straight up - Lopez was tired. Loma didn't do it. Just like Manny didn't finish Horn in Round 9 like he should have.
And we see what happens when fighters don't finish.
So...Lopez got his hand raised amidst sketchy scorecards. It's fine he got his hand raised. But what I saw isn't what Max Kellerman saw. I saw a Loma who had a crap strategy giving away a fight. I saw a Lopez who had not improved his defense at all from the Nagatani fight.
In a rematch, Loma wins if only because Lopez wouldn't be as focused.
You jumped your dumb a$$ out on a limb with that fanboy prediction and embarrassed yourself. No, instead of eating the humble pie and just acknowledging that you were wrong, you make excuses like a btch. Pathetic....absolutely pitiful.Comment
-
You apparently have missed the 17 times I posted that a close Teo win is acceptable. That's coolAnother clown poster who should have a negative karma rating lol.
You jumped your dumb a$$ out on a limb with that fanboy prediction and embarrassed yourself. No, instead of eating the humble pie and just acknowledging that you were wrong, you make excuses like a btch. Pathetic....absolutely pitiful.Comment
Comment